Brascarbon Methane Recovery Project BCA-BRA-16
Score Breakdown
Integrity
verified The validation report confirms additionality through an investment test, and the VVB named as ICONTEC verified it.
missing Leakage treatment is weakly supported because the monitoring report says it was not addressed, even though a later validation report calls it negligible.
Transparency
verified The monitoring report provides a defined monitoring period and a verified emission reduction total of 99,467 tCO2e.
missing The usage-monitoring method is not stated, and CORSIA eligibility is not found in the extracted record.
Claim Safety
verified The project uses a project baseline under AMS-III.D, which is at least a defined methodology rather than an absent baseline.
missing Claim safety is weakened by the leakage inconsistency and by missing information on CORSIA eligibility, CCP status, and verified usage rates.
Documentation
verified Multiple official documents were used, including validation, monitoring, PDD, and issuance records, with high extraction confidence.
missing The record still has important gaps, including no buffer pool percentage, no baseline reassessment date, and no quantified usage monitoring.
Detailed Analysis
Integrity
The project has a positive integrity signal because the validation report confirms additionality through an investment test, and ICONTEC is identified as the VVB. The monitoring report also reports no material findings and no corrective actions required. That said, leakage handling is not robustly documented: the monitoring report says leakage was not addressed, while a later validation report says it was deemed negligible, so the evidence is mixed.
Transparency
Transparency is moderate because the monitoring report states a clear monitoring period from 2022-02-01 to 2023-12-31 and reports 99,467 verified emission reductions. However, the usage-monitoring method is not stated in the extracted record, and CORSIA eligibility is also not found. The absence of a claimed total in the extracted facts limits reconciliation of claimed versus verified issuance.
Claim Safety
Claim safety is middling because the project uses a recognized methodology, AMS-III.D, and a project baseline is identified. Still, the leakage inconsistency creates over-crediting risk, and the record does not provide verified usage rates or a clear public eligibility status for CORSIA or CCP. The project therefore cannot be treated as low-risk for dual-market or over-claim concerns.
Documentation
Documentation quality is fair but incomplete. The record draws on multiple official documents, including validation, monitoring, PDD, and issuance materials, and extraction confidence is high. Even so, several important fields are missing or not quantified, including buffer pool coverage, baseline reassessment timing, and usage monitoring details, which weakens the completeness of the evidence base.
Overall
Overall, this is a moderately credible avoidance project with some strong elements, especially VVB-verified additionality and a clean finding record in the monitoring report. The main reliability issue is the set of contradictions: the verified emission reduction total is higher in the later validation report than in the earlier one, so the later validation figure is the more recent and therefore privileged value; leakage is also inconsistent, so the later validation statement that it was deemed negligible is privileged over the earlier monitoring note that it was not addressed, but the inconsistency still lowers confidence. Safeguard statements also changed from false in issuance to true in the later monitoring report, so the more recent monitoring report is privileged, but the shift suggests documentation instability.
Audit Analysis
This is a registered VCS methane recovery project with VVB-confirmed investment-test additionality and no material findings reported in the monitoring record. However, several key items are weakly documented or inconsistent, especially leakage treatment, the absence of a stated usage-monitoring method, and conflicting figures and safeguard statements across documents.
Project Description
The purpose of this project is to mitigate and recover animal effluent related greenhouse Gas (GHG) by improving the Animal Waste Management System practices in the confined animal feed operations in the different cities located at the Mato Grosso do Sul state, central Brazil. In Brazil the agricultural operations related to the animals procedures are very wide and grow progressively and intensive to attend the worldwide food demand. Prior to the implementation of the project activity the animal wastewater, which consists of fresh water mixed with manure and urine accumulated in pits under or beside the barns, and was transported to one open lagoon for evaporation, fed by gravity pipeline systems. The organic material degraded in the primary treatment lagoon produced significant amounts of methane. These systems emit methane (CH4) resulting from anaerobic decomposition process. The swine livestock operations create profound environmental consequences, such as greenhouse gas emissions, odour and water/land contamination that result of storing animal waste, where this operation is not sustainable due to its severe environmental pollution. This project involved the construction of a new covered in-ground anaerobic reactors (digesters) that will utilize the organic material currently treated in the wastewater opened lagoon, of the confined animal operations to produce biogas. All manure will be sent daily directly to a digester not exceeding 24 hours in the barns. The methane is captured and flared to form CO2 which has a much lower climate impact compared with Methane. The plan is to use the flaring to also generate electricity in the future. No electricity will be consumed from the grid. The electrical parts that will be powered by energy will be supplied by solar cells and using rechargeable batteries.
Red Flags
- Leakage is inconsistently described: the monitoring report says it was not addressed, while the validation report later says it was deemed negligible.
- The verified emission reduction total differs across validation documents, and the project’s public claim-safety signals are incomplete because CORSIA eligibility and CCP status are not stated.
Credit Vintages
| Issued | Retired | Available | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 54,081 | 29,081 | 25,000 | |
| 2022 | 46,324 | 46,324 | 0 | |
| 2023 | 53,143 | 3,676 | 49,467 | |
| Total | 153,548 | 79,081 | 74,467 |
Cosa migliorerebbe questo punteggio
- Publish a reconciled emissions and leakage table that explains the difference between the earlier and later validation figures and clearly documents the final credited amount.
- Provide explicit usage-monitoring methodology, buffer pool treatment, and a clear statement on CORSIA eligibility and CCP status.
Questi suggerimenti indicano quali prove pubbliche aggiuntive potrebbero migliorare il livello di confidenza di questa valutazione. Non garantiscono un punteggio futuro più alto.
Risk Indicators
VVB-confirmed investment test
no buffer pool stated
inconsistent leakage treatment
project baseline stated
FPIC and grievance mechanism documented
CORSIA/CCP status not stated
Where to buy
Marketplaces
+ Know where to buy this?
Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].
⚑ Dispute this rating
Registry Documents
issuance
monitoring
Other
validation
- VCS-Joint-Validation-Verification_v.3_BRA 16_27.02.2023.pdf
- VCS-Verification-Representation-v4.1firm_2998 ICONTEC 251022.pdf
- VCS-Validation-Representation-v4.1firm_2998 ICONTEC 251022.pdf
- VCS VerR Project ID 2998 01022022-31122023 _v.3_clean_signed.pdf
- Verification-Representation-v4.2_BRAS 16-ID2998_v.1 signed.pdf
Sei il proprietario di questo progetto?
Correzione metadati (gratuita)
Nome, paese, marketplace o link errati? Segnalacelo.
Non modifica lo score.
[email protected] →Rivalutazione con nuovi documenti
Hai documentazione aggiornata non ancora inclusa? Puoi richiedere un nuovo run della pipeline con i nuovi input.
Invia Documenti →