Distillerie Coquerel Vineyard

Integrity

No additionality test, baseline method, baseline reassessment date, leakage deduction/justification, buffer contribution, or reversal information was found in the extracted record (document type listed as “unknown”, dated 2022-06-01). Without these, the robustness of additionality and baseline setting cannot be evaluated and permanence/leakage risks are unaddressed. Although the extracted record shows no material findings and no corrective actions, the absence of an identified VVB report means this provides little assurance.

Transparency

The extracted record does not provide a monitoring period, usage monitoring method, or any claimed versus verified emissions reductions, so MRV transparency is very limited. The VVB name is not found, and the registry field is also not found, reducing traceability for issuance and verification. Minimum extraction confidence is low, further weakening confidence in what is (and is not) captured.

Claim Safety

Because baseline method, leakage treatment, and verified emissions reductions are not found in the extracted record, the risk of over-crediting cannot be bounded. CORSIA eligibility and CCP status are also not found, so buyers cannot reliably interpret whether the credit is being positioned for higher-integrity claims or compliance-adjacent use. Overall, the lack of quantified and verified outcomes materially elevates greenwashing risk.

Documentation

Despite 6 documents reportedly used, the only evidence document label is “unknown” and the document type is “unknown”, dated 2022-06-01, which prevents basic document-level auditability. Minimum extraction confidence is low, indicating at least one key document was poorly readable and increasing the chance that critical details were missed. Key fields like methodology, monitoring period, and crediting period were not found in the extracted record, indicating incomplete documentation for assessment.

Overall

There are no listed contradictions in the extracted record, so internal consistency cannot be tested; the main issue is pervasive missing information. Given the low extraction confidence and the absence of core carbon-accounting and verification details (baseline, additionality, MRV, leakage, permanence), the project scores poorly across integrity, transparency, claim safety, and documentation. Note: under the stated gate rules, a documentation score below 3.0 would cap transparency post-scoring, but this JSON reports the pre-cap scores as requested.