Regenerative Agriculture Canada Vintage 2023, 2024 Documentazione completa General Methodology v2.0

John Butkiewicz

CM-ba57b4 ↗

3.4 / 10

Integrity

3.2

Transparency

3.8

Claim Safety

3.0

Documentation

4.2

Score Breakdown

Integrity

verified A named verifier, Control Union Malaysia, is present in the monitoring report, which supports some independent oversight.

missing Additionality is not stated and no leakage deduction, buffer pool percentage, or reversal treatment is documented in the extracted monitoring record.

Transparency

verified The project has a defined monitoring period and a recent monitoring report dated 2024-03-25.

missing Total ERR claimed versus verified is not available, and usage monitoring, FNRB, and registry completeness details are not stated.

Claim Safety

verified The monitoring report does not show any material findings or corrective actions, which avoids an immediate over-crediting signal.

missing The baseline is only described as project-based, with no reassessment timing, and the contradiction on CCP status creates uncertainty about market-claim safety.

Documentation

verified Three document types were used, and extraction confidence is high.

missing Several core fields remain unstated, including safeguards, grievance mechanism, and additionality testing, limiting the completeness of the evidence set.

Detailed Analysis

Integrity

The monitoring report identifies Control Union Malaysia as the VVB and reports no material findings or corrective actions, which is a modest positive. However, additionality is not stated in the extracted record, the baseline is only described as project-based, and there is no evidence of leakage deduction, buffer pool coverage, or reversal management beyond 'not addressed' for reversal events.

Transparency

Transparency is limited by missing quantitative reporting: total ERR claimed and verified are not available, and usage monitoring, FNRB, and leakage justification are not stated. The monitoring period is clearly defined and the report is recent, but the record does not provide enough public-facing MRV detail to score highly.

Claim Safety

Claim safety is weakened by the absence of a quantified leakage treatment and by the project-specific baseline, which is less robust than a standardized or jurisdictional baseline. The contradiction on CCP status also matters: I privileged the monitoring report's 'not mentioned' value over the older validation report's 'approved' value because it is the more recent document, but the inconsistency still lowers confidence in market-claim safety.

Documentation

Documentation is moderately complete in that the evidence set includes a PDD, validation report, and monitoring report, and extraction confidence is high. Even so, several core items are missing or unstated, including safeguards, grievance mechanism, additionality testing, and key monitoring quantities, so the file is not fully complete.

Overall

The project sits in a weak-to-moderate quality range because the available documents do not substantiate several core carbon-credit integrity claims. The contradiction on CCP status is explicitly addressed by privileging the more recent monitoring report over the validation report, but the inconsistency still reduces reliability. Because integrity remains below a strong threshold and several safeguards are absent or unstated, the overall score stays low.

Audit Analysis

The project has some documentation and a named VVB, but key quality elements are missing or not stated, including additionality testing, leakage treatment, and permanence safeguards. The monitoring report also leaves important claims unresolved, and there is a contradiction on CCP status that reduces confidence in the record.

Project Description

Located in Rolling Hills, AB, John Butkiewicz operates a family-owned farm spanning over 450 acres, dedicated to sustainability and environmental stewardship. Actively pursuing certification for regenerative farming, John aims to enhance his farm’s impact while contributing to the growing movement of sustainable agriculture. As a key rotational crop, hemp plays a key role in soil regeneration, carbon capture, and sustainable agriculture. By cultivating hemp, they sequester carbon, restore soil health, and promote long-term environmental resilience. Hemp’s deep root system stores carbon by depositing organic matter into the soil, improving long-term soil organic carbon (SOC) levels. As the roots decay, they lock carbon into the ground, enhancing soil fertility. The plant’s rapid growth allows it to absorb large amounts of CO₂ through photosynthesis, converting it into biomass. Its stalks, composed of up to 70% cellulose, retain carbon until they decompose or are processed into durable products. Revenue from carbon credit sales is essential for John to invest in sustainable farming, expand operations, and implement new technologies that enhance carbon capture. Without this revenue, sustaining regenerative practices and scaling hemp acres would be limited. Corporate buyers investing in John’s carbon credits can be confident that their funding directly supports measurable environmental impact. The HCS 10-year carbon credits are independently verified, ensuring that carbon sequestration is additional—not just a result of traditional farming operations. HCS’s advanced Measurement, Reporting, and Verification (MRV) system uses precision remote sensing technology to track carbon capture with accuracy and transparency while minimizing leakage. This rigorous monitoring process strengthens the credibility of John’s carbon credits. Beyond carbon sequestration, John’s regenerative farming methods improve soil health, enhance biodiversity, and reduce reliance on

Red Flags

No additionality test or VVB-confirmed additionality is stated in the extracted record.
Leakage, buffer pool coverage, and reversal handling are not addressed in the available monitoring information.
CCP status is contradictory across documents, with the monitoring report saying it is not mentioned while the validation report reportedly says approved.

Credit Vintages

Nessuna emissione registrata sul registro.

Il marketplace dichiara i vintage: 2023, 2024 (non verificato).

Cosa migliorerebbe questo punteggio

Provide a clear additionality assessment and VVB confirmation, with the underlying test and supporting calculations.
Document leakage treatment, permanence safeguards such as buffer pool coverage or reversal provisions, and resolve the CCP status contradiction with primary registry evidence.

Questi suggerimenti indicano quali prove pubbliche aggiuntive potrebbero migliorare il livello di confidenza di questa valutazione. Non garantiscono un punteggio futuro più alto.