Tayazú
CT-60
Score Breakdown
Integrity
missing No evidence found in the extracted record for additionality testing, baseline method, leakage treatment, buffer/reversal provisions, or findings/corrective actions
inferred REDD project type typically requires strong permanence and leakage controls, but these were not found in the extracted record
Transparency
missing No monitoring/verification details (periods, VVB, errors, MRV methods) were found in the extracted record
missing Registry-relevant fields (e.g., eligibility/status indicators) were not found in the extracted record
Claim Safety
missing Over-crediting and greenwashing risk cannot be screened because baseline approach, leakage justification, and MRV outcomes were not found in the extracted record
inferred CORSIA/CCP status was not found in the extracted record, leaving double-claim/eligibility risk unresolved
Documentation
missing No evidence documents were provided in the extracted record (0 documents used)
missing Minimum extraction confidence is low, reducing confidence that key requirements were captured
Detailed Analysis
Integrity
No project integrity determinants were found in the extracted record: there is no information on additionality testing, baseline methodology or reassessment, leakage deductions/justification, buffer pool contribution, or any reversal events. Because this is a REDD project type, the absence of permanence and leakage controls in the available record is a major evidence gap. With no verification/monitoring findings available, integrity must be scored conservatively.
Transparency
The extracted record contains no monitoring period, VVB name, MRV methods, or quantified results (e.g., claimed vs verified emission reductions). There are also no public-document indicators captured (no evidence documents listed), so transparency cannot be substantiated. Given the lack of extracted content, transparency is scored very low.
Claim Safety
Claim safety depends on demonstrable conservativeness in baseline setting, leakage treatment, and verified performance, none of which were found in the extracted record. Eligibility indicators relevant to double-claim risk (e.g., CORSIA/CCP status) were not found in the extracted record, so the risk cannot be bounded. As a result, the project is scored conservatively for claim safety.
Documentation
No documents were used in the extraction (0 listed), and the minimum extraction confidence is low, indicating at least one key source was poorly readable. This combination implies a high likelihood of missing critical information and prevents cross-checking across documents. Documentation completeness and reliability are therefore scored extremely low (note: documentation < 3.0 would cap transparency under the gate rules).
Overall
There are no contradictions listed in the extracted record, but this is because there is effectively no extracted content to compare. With zero documents and low extraction confidence, the assessment is dominated by evidence gaps across all quality dimensions. Overall is therefore very low, and the documentation gate rule would apply post-scoring to cap transparency.
Audit Analysis
The extracted record contains no usable project facts beyond basic metadata, and the minimum extraction confidence is low. With no accessible evidence on baseline setting, additionality, leakage, permanence controls, or MRV results, the project cannot be assessed as high-quality based on the available documentation.
Project Description
Project Name: Tayazú Saving the Amazon forest in Colombia Location: Various locations in Colombia, with a focus on the department of Vaupés Developer: Saving the Amazon Foundation Project Overview: Saving the Amazon is a Colombian foundation dedicated to the conservation of the Amazon rainforest and the well-being of indigenous communities residing within it. Their primary objective is to provide a global alternative for individuals, companies, and institutions to address the climate crisis and support vulnerable populations. Why this project needs your support Carbon Sequestration and Improved Lives: Saving the Amazon has developed a unique model that combines carbon sequestration through tree planting with improving the quality of life for indigenous communities. By supporting this project, you contribute to both combating climate change through carbon sequestration and uplifting the livelihoods of indigenous communities. Empowering Indigenous Communities: The foundation focuses on supporting indigenous communities in various locations, including the department of Vaupés in Colombia. These communities have been caretakers of the Amazon rainforest for centuries. However, they face significant injustices and are disproportionately affected by multidimensional poverty, lacking access to education, healthcare, sanitation, and employment. Your support helps empower these communities, providing them with opportunities for a better future. The Tayazú Project: Saving the Amazon's Tayazú project unites four Vaupés communities (Tayazú, Timbó, Tribón, and Santa Cruz), comprising 50 families and approximately 200 people, to plant 15,000 trees. By participating in this project, you contribute to offsetting approximately 15,000 tons of CO2 and generating income for these families over a period of 36 months. Each tree is valued at €5, and a minimum quantity of 10,000 trees can be purchased at this price, offering a lon
Red Flags
- No project documents were available in the extracted record (0 documents used), preventing verification of baseline, additionality, leakage, permanence, or MRV claims
- Low extraction confidence indicates at least one key document was poorly readable, increasing the risk of missing or misinterpreted critical information
Credit Vintages
Nessuna emissione registrata sul registro.
Il marketplace dichiara i vintage: 2020 (non verificato).
Cosa migliorerebbe questo punteggio
- Provide the PDD, latest monitoring report, and latest verification report so baseline approach, additionality, leakage, permanence/buffer provisions, and verified results can be assessed
- Provide registry and eligibility disclosures (VVB identity, monitoring periods, issuance/retirement records, and any CORSIA/CCP status statements) and ensure documents are machine-readable to raise extraction confidence
Questi suggerimenti indicano quali prove pubbliche aggiuntive potrebbero migliorare il livello di confidenza di questa valutazione. Non garantiscono un punteggio futuro più alto.
Risk Indicators
No additionality evidence found
Permanence controls not evidenced
Leakage treatment not evidenced
Baseline method not evidenced
Safeguards not evidenced
Eligibility/status not evidenced
Where to buy
Marketplaces
+ Know where to buy this?
Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].
⚑ Dispute this rating
Sei il proprietario di questo progetto?
Correzione metadati (gratuita)
Nome, paese, marketplace o link errati? Segnalacelo.
Non modifica lo score.
[email protected] →Rivalutazione con nuovi documenti
Hai documentazione aggiornata non ancora inclusa? Puoi richiedere un nuovo run della pipeline con i nuovi input.
Invia Documenti →