CarbonMeld CarbonMeld Carbon Observatory
Project database · methodology

JCR-EN-R-002 carbon credit projects

Browse 27 published projects using JCR-EN-R-002, listed alphabetically. There is no ranking for this methodology yet: it appears here automatically once 5 of its projects are rated. Open a project to view its registry details and the analysis available for that project.

← All leaderboards and methodology lists · Project database

What you're looking at

This is an alphabetical list of published projects using JCR-EN-R-002. There are not yet 5 projects with a current score and a registry status eligible for ranking. Some projects may already have an assessment; each dossier shows the analysis available.

CarbonMeld scores assess integrity, transparency, claim safety and documentation using project documents. Higher scores indicate stronger evidence under this framework. How to read CarbonMeld scores.

Project names, codes and registry status come from official registry records. Open a project dossier for its source record.

JCR-EN-R-002: Electricity

Official title, in Japanese: “太陽光発電設備の導入”

Methodology issuer: J-Credit Scheme · Official methodology page.

Electricity · Emission reductions

A site installs solar panels and uses at least part of the power itself. The method credits the emissions of the grid electricity that the self-consumed solar power replaces.

Source for the activity description

Version 3.7 · Active at J-Credit Scheme · status verified on

Version and status refer to the methodology at its issuer. Individual projects may use different versions; these facts do not establish credit eligibility in other programs.

How CarbonMeld reads projects of this type

Versions of the official text these rules cover: Ver.3.7

What CarbonMeld reads

  • Additionality: the project must show it with a test. CarbonMeld reads the test in the documents.
  • Grid emission factor: the methodology sets rules for it (EN-R-002 Ver.3.7 §5, p. 5). CarbonMeld reads it in the project's documents.

Set by the methodology, not assessed in this analysis

  • Usage rate of the devices: the methodology sets rules for it (EN-R-002 Ver.3.7 condition 2, p. 1). This analysis does not assess it.
  • No legal requirement for the activity: the methodology sets rules for it in some cases. This analysis does not assess it.
  • Tracking of the end use: the methodology sets rules for it (EN-R-002 Ver.3.7 condition 2 note, p. 2). This analysis does not assess it.
  • Social safeguards and consent of communities (FPIC): the methodology sets rules for it (EN-R-002 Ver.3.7 condition 4, p. 1). This analysis does not assess it.

Not applicable to this type — never a gap

  • Leakage: the criterion does not apply to this methodology. CarbonMeld never counts it as a gap.
  • Buffer pool: the criterion does not apply to this methodology. CarbonMeld never counts it as a gap.
  • Permanence and reversals: the criterion does not apply to this methodology. CarbonMeld never counts it as a gap.
  • Fraction of non-renewable biomass (fNRB): the criterion does not apply to this methodology. CarbonMeld never counts it as a gap.
  • Durability of the storage: the criterion does not apply to this methodology. CarbonMeld never counts it as a gap.
  • Sustainability of the feedstock: the criterion does not apply to this methodology. CarbonMeld never counts it as a gap.

The general rules apply as well. Read the general rules.

Listed alphabetically, not ranked. A methodology leaderboard is computed automatically once 5 of its projects have a current CarbonMeld score and a rankable registry status (projects still in the pipeline or under validation are not ranked). Read the methodology.