JVER-R002 carbon credit projects
Browse 2 published projects using JVER-R002, listed alphabetically. There is no ranking for this methodology yet: it appears here automatically once 5 of its projects are rated. Open a project to view its registry details and the analysis available for that project.
What you're looking at
This is an alphabetical list of published projects using JVER-R002. There are not yet 5 projects with a current score and a registry status eligible for ranking. Some projects may already have an assessment; each dossier shows the analysis available.
CarbonMeld scores assess integrity, transparency, claim safety and documentation using project documents. Higher scores indicate stronger evidence under this framework. How to read CarbonMeld scores.
Project names, codes and registry status come from official registry records. Open a project dossier for its source record.
JVER-R002: Forestry
Official title, in Japanese: “森林経営活動によるCO2吸収量の増大（持続可能な森林経営促進型プロジェクト）”
Methodology issuer: Ministry of the Environment, Japan (J-VER scheme) · Official methodology page.
Forestry · CO2 removals
Forest owners in Japan practise sustainable forest management under the former J-VER offset scheme, which was later merged into the J-Credit Scheme. The method credits CO2 taken up in areas thinned, harvested or planted since fiscal 1990.
How CarbonMeld reads projects of this type
Versions of the official text these rules cover: 6.3
What CarbonMeld reads
- Additionality: the methodology itself gives it (p. 2). The project needs no test of its own.
- Permanence and reversals: the methodology sets rules for it (p. 3). CarbonMeld reads it in the project's documents.
Not applicable to this type — never a gap
- Grid emission factor: the criterion does not apply to this methodology. CarbonMeld never counts it as a gap.
- Leakage: the criterion does not apply to this methodology. CarbonMeld never counts it as a gap.
- Buffer pool: the criterion does not apply to this methodology. CarbonMeld never counts it as a gap.
- Fraction of non-renewable biomass (fNRB): the criterion does not apply to this methodology. CarbonMeld never counts it as a gap.
- Usage rate of the devices: the criterion does not apply to this methodology. CarbonMeld never counts it as a gap.
- No legal requirement for the activity: the criterion does not apply to this methodology. CarbonMeld never counts it as a gap.
- Durability of the storage: the criterion does not apply to this methodology. CarbonMeld never counts it as a gap.
- Sustainability of the feedstock: the criterion does not apply to this methodology. CarbonMeld never counts it as a gap.
- Tracking of the end use: the criterion does not apply to this methodology. CarbonMeld never counts it as a gap.
- Social safeguards and consent of communities (FPIC): the criterion does not apply to this methodology. CarbonMeld never counts it as a gap.
The general rules apply as well. Read the general rules.
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
Listed alphabetically, not ranked. A methodology leaderboard is computed automatically once 5 of its projects have a current CarbonMeld score and a rankable registry status (projects still in the pipeline or under validation are not ranked). Read the methodology.