LBC-HAIES carbon credit projects
Browse 25 published projects using LBC-HAIES, listed alphabetically. There is no ranking for this methodology yet: it appears here automatically once 5 of its projects are rated. Open a project to view its registry details and the analysis available for that project.
What you're looking at
This is an alphabetical list of published projects using LBC-HAIES. There are not yet 5 projects with a current score and a registry status eligible for ranking. Some projects may already have an assessment; each dossier shows the analysis available.
CarbonMeld scores assess integrity, transparency, claim safety and documentation using project documents. Higher scores indicate stronger evidence under this framework. How to read CarbonMeld scores.
Project names, codes and registry status come from official registry records. Open a project dossier for its source record.
LBC-HAIES: Haies
Methodology issuer: Label bas-carbone · Official methodology page.
Agroforestry · Emission reductions and CO2 removals
Farms and other landowners in France plant hedgerows and manage them sustainably. The method counts the carbon stored in hedge biomass and soil, and the emissions avoided when hedge wood replaces fossil energy or less durable materials.
Active at Label bas-carbone · status verified on
Version and status refer to the methodology at its issuer. Individual projects may use different versions; these facts do not establish credit eligibility in other programs.
How CarbonMeld reads projects of this type
Versions of the official text these rules cover: Arrêté du 5 septembre 2025 (référentiel du Label bas carbone), Méthode Plantation de vergers (23 Oct 2020), Méthode Haies v2 (08/06/2021), Méthode boisement v3 (02/09/2025), Méthode boisement v2 (27/07/2020), Méthode reconstitution de peuplements forestiers dégradés v2 (27/07/2020)
What CarbonMeld reads
- Additionality: the project must show it with a test (Arrêté du 5 septembre 2025 art. 2, p. 2). CarbonMeld reads the test in the documents.
- Leakage: the methodology sets rules for it (Arrêté du 5 septembre 2025 art. 9, p. 6). CarbonMeld reads it in the project's documents. The Boisement, Reconstitution, Plantation de vergers and Haies methods set no leakage term.
- Permanence and reversals: the methodology sets rules for it (Boisement v3 §1, p. 7). CarbonMeld reads it in the project's documents.
Deductions that can apply
- REDD+ and reforestation: if the documents read do not address leakage, CarbonMeld lowers integrity by 1.5 and shows a red flag. At the listing stage, the gate does not apply when the programme's listing form has no section on leakage.
Not applicable to this type — never a gap in our current method
- Grid emission factor: the criterion does not apply to this methodology. Our current method never counts it as a gap.
- Buffer pool: the criterion does not apply to this methodology. Our current method never counts it as a gap.
- Fraction of non-renewable biomass (fNRB): the criterion does not apply to this methodology. Our current method never counts it as a gap.
- Usage rate of the devices: the criterion does not apply to this methodology. Our current method never counts it as a gap.
- Durability of the storage: the criterion does not apply to this methodology. Our current method never counts it as a gap.
- Sustainability of the feedstock: the criterion does not apply to this methodology. Our current method never counts it as a gap.
- Tracking of the end use: the criterion does not apply to this methodology. Our current method never counts it as a gap.
- Social safeguards and consent of communities (FPIC): the criterion does not apply to this methodology. Our current method never counts it as a gap.
The general rules apply as well. Read the general rules.
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
Listed alphabetically, not ranked. A methodology leaderboard is computed automatically once 5 of its projects have a current CarbonMeld score and a rankable registry status (projects still in the pipeline or under validation are not ranked). Read the methodology.
