CarbonMeld CarbonMeld Carbon Observatory
Project database · methodology

LBC-PLANTATION-VERGERS carbon credit projects

Browse 164 published projects using LBC-PLANTATION-VERGERS, listed alphabetically. There is no ranking for this methodology yet: it appears here automatically once 5 of its projects are rated. Open a project to view its registry details and the analysis available for that project.

← All leaderboards and methodology lists · Project database

What you're looking at

This is an alphabetical list of published projects using LBC-PLANTATION-VERGERS. There are not yet 5 projects with a current score and a registry status eligible for ranking. Some projects may already have an assessment; each dossier shows the analysis available.

CarbonMeld scores assess integrity, transparency, claim safety and documentation using project documents. Higher scores indicate stronger evidence under this framework. How to read CarbonMeld scores.

Project names, codes and registry status come from official registry records. Open a project dossier for its source record.

LBC-PLANTATION-VERGERS: Plantation de vergers

Methodology issuer: Label bas-carbone · Official methodology page.

Agriculture · Emission reductions and CO2 removals

Farms plant nut, pome or stone fruit orchards in France on land previously used as arable land, vineyard or permanent grassland. The method counts the carbon stored in the trees and soil, and the change in farm emissions, against continuing the previous land use.

Active at Label bas-carbone · status verified on

Version and status refer to the methodology at its issuer. Individual projects may use different versions; these facts do not establish credit eligibility in other programs.

How CarbonMeld reads projects of this type

Versions of the official text these rules cover: Référentiel (arrêté 28/11/2018 modifié 11/02/2022), Méthode boisement v3 (02/09/2025), Méthode boisement v2 (27/07/2020), Méthode reconstitution de peuplements forestiers dégradés v2 (27/07/2020)

What CarbonMeld reads

  • Additionality: the project must show it with a test (p. 2). CarbonMeld reads the test in the documents.
  • Leakage: the methodology sets rules for it (Référentiel II.C, p. 8). CarbonMeld reads it in the project's documents.
  • Permanence and reversals: the methodology sets rules for it (Boisement v3 §1, p. 7). CarbonMeld reads it in the project's documents.

Deductions that can apply

  • REDD+ and reforestation: if the documents read do not address leakage, CarbonMeld lowers integrity by 1.5 and shows a red flag.

Not applicable to this type — never a gap

  • Grid emission factor: the criterion does not apply to this methodology. CarbonMeld never counts it as a gap.
  • Buffer pool: the criterion does not apply to this methodology. CarbonMeld never counts it as a gap.
  • Fraction of non-renewable biomass (fNRB): the criterion does not apply to this methodology. CarbonMeld never counts it as a gap.
  • Usage rate of the devices: the criterion does not apply to this methodology. CarbonMeld never counts it as a gap.
  • Durability of the storage: the criterion does not apply to this methodology. CarbonMeld never counts it as a gap.
  • Sustainability of the feedstock: the criterion does not apply to this methodology. CarbonMeld never counts it as a gap.
  • Tracking of the end use: the criterion does not apply to this methodology. CarbonMeld never counts it as a gap.
  • Social safeguards and consent of communities (FPIC): the criterion does not apply to this methodology. CarbonMeld never counts it as a gap.

The general rules apply as well. Read the general rules.

Listed alphabetically, not ranked. A methodology leaderboard is computed automatically once 5 of its projects have a current CarbonMeld score and a rankable registry status (projects still in the pipeline or under validation are not ranked). Read the methodology.