CarbonMeld CarbonMeld Carbon Observatory
Project database · standard

Plan Vivo (PV) carbon credit projects

Browse 32 published projects registered under Plan Vivo (PV), listed alphabetically. There is no ranking for this standard yet: it appears here automatically once 5 of its projects are rated. Open a project to view its registry details and the analysis available for that project.

Registry: Plan Vivo

← All leaderboards · Project database

How CarbonMeld reads projects of this standard

Versions of the official text these rules cover: 4 (2013)

What CarbonMeld reads

  • Additionality: the project must show it with a test (Plan Vivo Standard 2013 §5, p. 19). CarbonMeld reads the test in the documents.
  • Leakage: the methodology sets rules for it (Plan Vivo Standard 2013 §5.19, p. 21). CarbonMeld reads it in the project's documents.
  • Buffer pool: the methodology sets rules for it (Plan Vivo Standard 2013 §6.3, p. 22). CarbonMeld reads it in the project's documents.
  • Permanence and reversals: the methodology sets rules for it (Plan Vivo Standard 2013 §6.1, p. 22). CarbonMeld reads it in the project's documents.

Figures set against the standard's own values

  • The minimum buffer share is 10% (as stated in Plan Vivo Standard 2013; Plan Vivo Standard 2013, p. 22). CarbonMeld shows the share in the documents next to it. It says when the share is below the minimum.buffer share: 10% · source: Plan Vivo Standard 2013, p. 22

Deductions that can apply

  • REDD+ and reforestation: if the documents read do not address leakage, CarbonMeld lowers integrity by 1.5 and shows a red flag.
  • REDD+ and reforestation: if the documents read do not state the buffer pool share, CarbonMeld shows a red flag. It lowers no score.

Set by the standard, not assessed in this analysis

  • Social safeguards and consent of communities (FPIC): the methodology sets rules for it (Plan Vivo Standard 2013 §8, p. 25). This analysis does not assess it.

Not applicable to this type — never a gap

  • Grid emission factor: the criterion does not apply to this methodology. CarbonMeld never counts it as a gap.
  • Fraction of non-renewable biomass (fNRB): the criterion does not apply to this methodology. CarbonMeld never counts it as a gap.
  • Usage rate of the devices: the criterion does not apply to this methodology. CarbonMeld never counts it as a gap.
  • Durability of the storage: the criterion does not apply to this methodology. CarbonMeld never counts it as a gap.
  • Sustainability of the feedstock: the criterion does not apply to this methodology. CarbonMeld never counts it as a gap.
  • Tracking of the end use: the criterion does not apply to this methodology. CarbonMeld never counts it as a gap.

The general rules apply as well. Read the general rules.

Listed alphabetically, not ranked. A standard's leaderboard is computed automatically once 5 of its projects have a current CarbonMeld score and a rankable registry status (projects still in the pipeline or under validation are not ranked). Read the methodology.