Feistner Farms

Integrity

The verification report for "Verification Of Net Ecosystem Exchange (Nee) Monitoring at System-Level of Hemp Carbon Standard Fields Using Carbon Space Technology Version 1.1" states that additionality was confirmed by the VVB, and it reports no material findings. That supports the project somewhat on integrity. However, the baseline method, leakage deduction, buffer pool, and reversal information are not stated in the available documents, so permanence and baseline robustness remain weakly evidenced.

Transparency

The monitoring period is clearly identified as 2024-01-01 to 2024-12-31, and the VVB is named as Control Union Malaysia. Beyond that, the record does not state verified or claimed ERR totals, usage monitoring method, or eligibility status, which makes the MRV trail incomplete. The medium extraction confidence also suggests the documentation may not be fully legible or complete.

Claim Safety

Claim safety is constrained by missing core accounting details. The report does not state a baseline method, leakage justification, or any verified versus claimed removal totals, so over-crediting risk cannot be well bounded. Because corsia eligibility and CCP status are not stated, the project cannot be treated as clearly excluded from dual-market claim risk.

Documentation

Documentation is only moderate because two document sources were used, but the extracted record still leaves many key fields unstated. The report date is recent, which helps, but the medium extraction confidence lowers trust in completeness. No corrective actions were required, which is positive, but the file still lacks several items needed for a strong documentation score.

Overall

There are no contradictions listed in the extracted record, so no conflict-resolution was needed. I privileged the verification report because it is the most recent and directly relevant document for the monitoring period, but the absence of baseline, leakage, and eligibility details still weighs heavily. Under the scoring rules, the weak documentation does not trigger the transparency cap, and integrity remains above the threshold that would force an overall cap, but the project still scores as only moderate quality.