Guizhou Panjiang Low Concentration Coal Mine Methane Power Generation Project Phase 2
#55of 64 in Methane#180of 204 in China#568of 629 in Verra (VCS)#15of 16 in ACM0008
Audit Analysis
A VCS coal-mine methane power-generation project with VVB-confirmed additionality and legally mandated capture, but undermined by four material findings (including a double-counting concern), contradictory leakage justifications across documents, a project-specific baseline, and low extraction confidence across 16 source documents. The verified ERR is roughly 92% of the pro-rata expectation for the elapsed monitoring period, indicating reasonable delivery, yet the documentation quality and safeguards gaps limit confidence in the credit's integrity.
Red Flags
- Material Finding 4 in the verification report flags missing proof that double counting with CCER/CDM has not occurred; a corrective action was raised and closed, but the underlying risk is specific to a Chinese project where CCER registration is common.
- Leakage justification is contradictory: the verification report (2020-08-25) states leakage was 'quantified' while the monitoring report (2021-10-29) describes it as 'deemed negligible', with a 0% deduction in both cases.
- FPIC was not conducted and no grievance mechanism is in place, despite the project operating in a community-adjacent coal mine in Guizhou, China.
- Minimum extraction confidence across the 16 source documents is rated low, meaning at least one key document was poorly readable and several critical fields (buffer pool, FNRB, usage monitoring, CORSIA eligibility) remain unconfirmed.
- Gas capture legally mandated — additionality in doubt
Credit Vintages
| Issued | Retired | Available | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 290,306 | 7 | 290,299 | |
| 2019 | 344,680 | 8,065 | 336,615 | |
| 2020 | 381,402 | 381,402 | 0 | |
| 2021 | 95,328 | 18,180 | 77,148 | |
| Total | 1,111,716 | 407,654 | 704,062 |
Risk Indicators
VVB-confirmed but test type unspecified
Methane consumed for power; buffer pool not stated
0% deduction with contradictory justifications
Project-specific measured baseline; reassessment not yet due
Safeguards mentioned but no FPIC or grievance mechanism
CCER/CDM double-counting flagged; CORSIA/CCP not stated
⚑ Dispute this rating
Are you the project owner?
Metadata correction (free)
Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.
Does not modify the score.
[email protected] →Pipeline re-run with new documents
Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.
Submit Documents →