Skip to main content
CarbonMeld CarbonMeld Carbon Observatory
Tools
EN
Rankings · country

Top Zambia projects

39 rated projects in this country · average score 4.8/10 · ranked by CarbonMeld's document-based assessment scores across all four dimensions: integrity, transparency, claim safety and documentation.

← All leaderboards · Full database

#1Itezhi Tezhi Hydro PowerCDMRenewable energyRegistry: Registered6.4/10▼-0.3#2Fuel Efficient Stoves in Zambia – Korea Carbon Management Ltd. CPA No.1VCSOtherRegistry: Registered6.3/10▲+0.7#3TASC Clean Cooking PoA - VPA 6 (Zambia)GSCookstovesRegistry: Registered6.2/10▼-0.7
  1. 4
    ZAMBIA EASTERN PROVINCE SAFE WATERGSWaterRegistry: Registered
    6.1▼-0.1
  2. 56▲+0.2
  3. 65.8▲+0.7
  4. 7
    *Zengamina Mini Hydro Scheme- ZambiaGSOtherRegistry: Registered
    5.5
  5. 85.5▲+4.8
  6. 95.5▲+0.4
  7. 105.3▲+0.3
  8. 11
    Improved Cookstoves Program for ZambiaCDMCookstovesRegistry: Registered
    5.2▼-0.2
  9. 125.2▲+0.7
  10. 135.2▼-0.3
  11. 14
    Improved Cookstoves for Rural ZambiaGSCookstovesRegistry: Registered
    5.2▲+0.2
  12. 155▼-0.2
  13. 165▼-0.7
  14. 17
    TASC Clean Cooking PoA – VPA 3 (Zambia)GSCookstovesRegistry: Registered
    4.8▲+0.4
  15. 184.8▼-1.4
  16. 194.8▲+0.2
  17. 204.8▼-0.3
  18. 214.7▼-0.2
  19. 224.7▼-1.6
  20. 23
    Zambia Biochar Carbon Removal ProgramCSIBiocharRegistry: Registered
    4.6
  21. 244.6▼-2.9
  22. 254.6▼-2.4
  23. 264.5▼-2.0
  24. 274.5▼-1.8
  25. 28
    Luangwa Community Forests ProjectVCSSoil carbonRegistry: Issuance requested
    4.5▼-1.7
  26. 294.4▼-0.1
  27. 304.4▼-0.2
  28. 314.4▼-0.7
  29. 32
    LOWER ZAMBEZI REDD+ PROJECTVCSSoil carbonRegistry: Issuance requested
    4.3▼-1.1
  30. 33
    TASC Clean Cooking PoA – VPA 1 (Zambia)GSCookstovesRegistry: Registered
    4▼-2.0
  31. 344▼-0.4
  32. 353.9▼-1.1
  33. 363.7▼-2.4
  34. 37
    Biochar in soil - ZambiaCSIBiocharRegistry: Registered
    3.5▼-2.3
  35. 38
    Tombwe Smallholder Reforestation ProjectVCSSoil carbonRegistry: Registered
    3.2▼-0.2
  36. 391.5

Rank is by document-based assessment score only. The registry status shown next to each project is a separate fact: inclusion in this ranking is not a statement of current validity or credit eligibility — projects suspended, withdrawn or terminated by their registry can still appear, with their status labelled. Read the methodology.