AM0037 carbon credit projects
Browse 7 published projects using AM0037, listed alphabetically. There is no ranking for this methodology yet: it appears here automatically once 5 of its projects are rated. Open a project to view its registry details and the analysis available for that project.
What you're looking at
This is an alphabetical list of published projects using AM0037. There are not yet 5 projects with a current score and a registry status eligible for ranking. Some projects may already have an assessment; each dossier shows the analysis available.
CarbonMeld scores assess integrity, transparency, claim safety and documentation using project documents. Higher scores indicate stronger evidence under this framework. How to read CarbonMeld scores.
Project names, codes and registry status come from official registry records. Open a project dossier for its source record. Registry / standard: CDM / UNFCCC .
AM0037: Flare (or vent) reduction and utilization of gas from oil wells as a feedstock
Methodology issuer: CDM / UNFCCC · Official methodology page.
Fugitive emissions · Emission reductions
Projects collect associated gas from oil wells that would otherwise be flared or vented and use it to make chemical products. The method compares emissions from gas recovery and use with the baseline gas disposal and chemical production processes.
Source for the activity description
Version 3.0 · Active at CDM / UNFCCC · status verified on
Version and status refer to the methodology at its issuer. Individual projects may use different versions; these facts do not establish credit eligibility in other programs.
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Analysis pending
- Analysis: Not registered
- Analysis: Not registered
- Analysis: Not registered
- Analysis: Not registered
- Analysis: Not registered
Listed alphabetically, not ranked. A methodology leaderboard is computed automatically once 5 of its projects have a current CarbonMeld score and a rankable registry status (projects still in the pipeline or under validation are not ranked). Read the methodology.
