Skip to main content
CarbonMeld CarbonMeld Carbon Observatory
Tools
EN
Project database · methodology

AMS-I.K carbon credit projects

Browse 1 published project using AMS-I.K, listed alphabetically. There is no ranking for this methodology yet: it appears here automatically once 5 of its projects are rated. Open a project to view its registry details and the analysis available for that project.

← All leaderboards and methodology lists · Project database

What you're looking at

This is an alphabetical list of published projects using AMS-I.K. There are not yet 5 projects with a current score and a registry status eligible for ranking. Some projects may already have an assessment; each dossier shows the analysis available.

CarbonMeld scores assess integrity, transparency, claim safety and documentation using project documents. Higher scores indicate stronger evidence under this framework. How to read CarbonMeld scores.

Project names, codes and registry status come from official registry records. Open a project dossier for its source record. Registry / standard: Gold Standard .

AMS-I.K: Solar cookers for households

Methodology issuer: CDM / UNFCCC · Official methodology page.

Household energy · Emission reductions

Projects provide solar cookers to households to replace fossil fuels or non-renewable biomass used for cooking. The method measures the emissions avoided through the use of the solar cookers.

Source for the activity description

Version 1.0 · Active at CDM / UNFCCC · status verified on

Version and status refer to the methodology at its issuer. Individual projects may use different versions; these facts do not establish credit eligibility in other programs.

  • Afstor Solar Cooker GS-3174 Gold Standard Zambia Registry: Registered
    Analysis: Analysis pending

Listed alphabetically, not ranked. A methodology leaderboard is computed automatically once 5 of its projects have a current CarbonMeld score and a rankable registry status (projects still in the pipeline or under validation are not ranked). Read the methodology.