Skip to main content
CDMHydroIndiaGeneral Methodologyv2.1

10MW Hydroelectric Power Project at Munirabad, Karnataka

CDM-10089 ↗

#1339of 1935 in Renewable energy#713of 975 in India#1059of 1459 in CDM (UNFCCC)

4.6/ 10
Integrity
5.5
Transparency
3.5
Claim Safety
4.5
Documentation
4.5

Audit Analysis

A 10 MW hydro project in Karnataka with a jurisdictional baseline and VVB-confirmed investment additionality test, but undermined by a seven-fold discrepancy in claimed emissions reductions between the PDD and validation report, seven material findings raised during validation, and a complete absence of monitoring or verified-credit data. The leakage treatment (0% deduction) is contradicted by an earlier appendix that described it as quantified, and no permanence or buffer mechanism is documented.

Red Flags

  • ERR contradiction: the validation report (Apr 2015) states 9,840 tCO₂e while the PDD (Dec 2014) states 68,880 tCO₂e — a 7× gap that is never reconciled in the available documents
  • Seven material findings (CAR-01 through CAR-07) were raised during validation, including an altered PDD template, an outdated emission-factor tool, and a missing energy-flow diagram
  • Leakage justification is inconsistent: the validation report calls it 'deemed negligible' while a 2012 appendix describes it as 'quantified'
  • No monitoring report, monitoring period, or verified ERR figure is present in the extracted record
  • Grid emission factor is fixed at 0.8418 tCO₂/MWh from 2012 with no evidence of periodic updating

Credit Vintages

No issuances recorded on the registry.

Risk Indicators

Additionality

Investment test, VVB-confirmed

Permanence

mixed evidence / unresolved risk

Leakage

0% deduction; justification contradicts earlier appendix

Baseline

Jurisdictional grid EF (0.8418, 2012)

Safeguards

Safeguards and benefit sharing mentioned; FPIC and grievance mechanism not found

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status not stated in available documents

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-09-01General Methodology v2.1

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents