Skip to main content
CDMBiomass EnergyIndiaGeneral Methodologyv2.1

12.0 MW Biomass based power plant project at Baghaura, Punjab, India.

CDM-5867 ↗

#149of 352 in Biomass#714of 975 in India#1060of 1459 in CDM (UNFCCC)

4.6/ 10
Integrity
6.5
Transparency
3.5
Claim Safety
4.0
Documentation
3.0

Audit Analysis

A 12 MW biomass power plant in Punjab, India, validated under CDM AMS.I.D v17 with a VVB-confirmed investment additionality test and a jurisdictional baseline. However, a tenfold discrepancy in the claimed emission reductions between the PDD and the validation report, combined with the absence of any verified monitoring data and low document extraction confidence, significantly undermines confidence in the project's quantified claims. The project is past its 2022 crediting period with no visible post-validation monitoring reports.

Red Flags

  • Tenfold discrepancy in total emission reductions: the PDD (2012-04-27) states 605,490 tCO2e while the validation report (2012-05-08) states 60,549 tCO2e — a factor-of-10 difference that cannot be reconciled from available documents
  • Grid emission factor contradiction: 0.8 tCO2/kWh in the validation report versus 0.942 tCO2/kWh in the financial document, with no explanation for the divergence
  • No verified emission reductions, monitoring period, or usage data found in any available document despite the project having passed its 2022 crediting period
  • Nine corrective actions were required at validation, including missing regulatory approval (DNA India letter), unsupported biomass consumption figures, and errors in the investment analysis (tariff, PLF, depreciation)
  • Minimum extraction confidence rated low, indicating at least one key document was poorly readable or incomplete

Credit Vintages

No issuances recorded on the registry.

Risk Indicators

Additionality

VVB-confirmed investment test

Permanence

Power generation – no reversal risk

Leakage

0% deemed negligible, thin justification

Baseline

Jurisdictional but EF contradiction (0.8 vs 0.942)

Safeguards

Mentioned but no FPIC or grievance mechanism

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status not stated

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-08-24General Methodology v2.1

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents