Skip to main content
CDMMethane avoidanceIndiaGeneral Methodologyv2.1

Accion Fraterna Biogas CDM project for rural communities in Anantapur, Andhra Pradesh

CDM-3779 ↗

#198of 268 in Biogas#827of 975 in India#1263of 1459 in CDM (UNFCCC)

4.2/ 10
Integrity
5.0
Transparency
3.5
Claim Safety
4.0
Documentation
3.5

Audit Analysis

A rural biogas methane-avoidance project in Andhra Pradesh with a reasonable investment-test additionality assessment and a quantified 5% leakage deduction, but undermined by four unresolved corrective actions, self-reported usage monitoring, contradictory FNRB methodology claims across documents, and a low-confidence extraction that limits verifiability. The project lacks a stated buffer pool and any monitoring-period data, leaving permanence and delivery claims largely unverified.

Red Flags

  • Four corrective actions (CAR-01 through CAR-04) remain unresolved in the validation report, including incorrect UNFCCC reference numbers, inappropriate gases in baseline tables, and missing sample survey sheets
  • FNRB methodology is contradictory: the validation report states a national default (0.737) while an appendix references a local field measurement, creating uncertainty about the actual emission factor used
  • Total ERR claimed shows a discrepancy of 29,784 tCO2e (validation report) versus 208,488 tCO2e (unidentified source), a factor-of-seven gap that cannot be reconciled from available documents
  • Usage monitoring relies entirely on self-reporting with no independent verification mechanism described

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2017
7,81707,817
2020
18,925018,925
2021
13,655013,655
Total40,397040,397

Risk Indicators

Additionality

Investment test present; VVB confirmation not captured in re

Permanence

reversal history not documented

Leakage

5% quantified deduction with stated justification

Baseline

Project-specific baseline; FNRB method contradicted across d

Safeguards

Grievance mechanism and benefit sharing present; FPIC not co

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status not stated in available documents

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-08-25General Methodology v2.1

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents