Skip to main content
ACRIndustrial Process EmissionsVIRGINIA; NEW YORK; DELAWARE, USGeneral Methodologyv2.1

Advanced Refrigeration - ARS2022008

ACR-1088 ↗

#76of 110 in Water#247of 389 in United States#131of 195 in American Carbon Registry (ACR)

4.7/ 10
Integrity
5.5
Transparency
4.5
Claim Safety
3.5
Documentation
5.0

Audit Analysis

This ACR Advanced Refrigeration project (ARS methodology v3.0) has VVB-confirmed additionality via a combined test, but is undermined by five material findings—including calculation errors in refrigerant leak-rate parameters—and a striking discrepancy where the verified ERR for a single ~11-month monitoring period equals the entire 10-year lifetime ex-ante estimate. The project-specific baseline, unaddressed leakage in the validation report, and absence of FNRB and usage-monitoring data further weaken confidence in the credit quantity.

Red Flags

  • Verified ERR of 92,410 tCO2e for a single ~11.5-month monitoring period is approximately 10× the pro-rata expectation (~8,870 tCO2e) derived from the 10-year lifetime ex-ante estimate of 92,410 tCO2e, suggesting either a data error or a fundamental mis-statement of the lifetime baseline
  • Five material findings in the verification report, including AERK,i values that did not incorporate separate leak rates for primary and secondary refrigerant loops, and inconsistent charge sizes for Wegmans #119, indicating calculation reliability issues
  • Leakage was deemed negligible in the monitoring report but was not addressed at all in the validation report, leaving the justification unverified
  • FNRB value, usage monitoring method, and CORSIA/CCP eligibility are all absent from the extracted record, limiting independent verification of the credit quantity

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2022
5,0175,0170
2023
87,39322,48364,910
Total92,41027,50064,910

Risk Indicators

Additionality

VVB-confirmed combined test

Permanence

Avoidance project – no carbon-stock reversal risk

Leakage

Deemed negligible but unverified in validation report

Baseline

Project-specific baseline, no reassessment date stated

Safeguards

Safeguards mentioned; FPIC not conducted, grievance mechanism not stated

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status not stated in available documents

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-09-12General Methodology v2.1

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents