Aluminum Recycling – A Solution for CO₂ Emissions Reduction, Romania
Score Breakdown
Integrity
verified Additionality was confirmed by the VVB, and the project uses a barrier test under AMS.III.AJ.
missing The baseline is project-specific and the last reassessment date is not stated in the available documents.
Transparency
verified The monitoring report provides a verified issuance figure and names the VVB, EPIC Sustainability Services Private Limited.
missing Several key MRV details are not stated, including the usage monitoring method and any public registry completeness beyond the extracted record.
Claim Safety
verified Leakage is treated with a quantified deduction of 0%, which is better than leaving it unaddressed.
missing The crediting period contradiction between the monitoring report and the PDD creates uncertainty about the project timeline and claim boundaries.
Documentation
verified Multiple evidence documents were used, including a validation report, monitoring report, PDD, and stakeholder consultation material.
missing Extraction confidence is low, and the record contains a direct contradiction on the crediting period, reducing trust in the documentation set.
Detailed Analysis
Integrity
The monitoring report confirms additionality through a barrier test and states that no reversal events were reported, which supports the project’s core environmental integrity. Leakage is treated with a quantified deduction of 0%, and the project is an avoidance activity, so permanence risk is inherently lower than for removal projects. The baseline is project-specific, but the last reassessment date is not stated in the available documents, which limits confidence in baseline robustness.
Transparency
The monitoring report identifies the VVB as EPIC Sustainability Services Private Limited and provides a verified issuance total, which helps with traceability. At the same time, several MRV details are not stated in the available documents, including the usage monitoring method and any clear registry completeness information beyond the extracted record. The extraction confidence is low, so transparency is further weakened by the possibility that some source details were not captured accurately.
Claim Safety
Claim safety is helped by the quantified leakage deduction and by the fact that the project is an avoidance project rather than a removal project with permanence exposure. However, the record does not state CORSIA eligibility or CCP status, so dual-market claim risk cannot be ruled out from the extracted facts alone. The contradiction on the crediting period also creates uncertainty about the exact claim window, which lowers confidence in the emissions claim.
Documentation
The evidence set is reasonably broad, with a validation report, monitoring report, PDD, and stakeholder consultation material all listed among the sources used. Even so, the extraction confidence is low, indicating that at least one key document was difficult to read and may have led to missing or imperfect extraction. The contradiction between the monitoring report and the PDD on the crediting period is a material documentation weakness, and it is more credible to privilege the newer monitoring report because it is more recent and operationally specific.
Overall
I privileged the monitoring report over the PDD for the crediting period because it is more recent and should reflect the latest project status, but the disagreement still reduces reliability. I also note a contradiction in the leakage treatment field, where the record simultaneously indicates a quantified treatment and a not-addressed value; I privileged the quantified leakage deduction because it is the more specific operational statement in the monitoring report. These inconsistencies, combined with low extraction confidence, justify a moderate overall score rather than a high one.
Audit Analysis
The project has some solid integrity signals: the VVB confirmed additionality, no reversal events were reported, and the monitoring report shows a quantified leakage treatment. However, the record has reliability issues, including a low extraction confidence and a contradiction on the crediting period, which weakens confidence in the documentation and claim safety. Overall, this looks like a moderately credible avoidance project, but not one with especially strong evidence quality.
Project Description
Located in Bucharest, Romania, this Energy Efficiency project by AS METAL COM transforms aluminium scrap into new products using advanced recycling technology. By avoiding energy-intensive primary aluminium production, the project achieves up to 95% energy savings while reducing CO₂ emissions significantly. Between May 2022 and February 2024, it achieved over 108,000 tCO₂e in verified emissions reductions and saved more than 250,000 MWh of energy. The project is certified under the Gold Standard using the AMS-III.AJ methodology, ensuring rigorous, transparent monitoring of energy consumption, fuel use, waste management, and aluminium processing volumes. By supporting local processing on an existing industrial site, the project reduces landfill waste, cuts transport-related emissions, and strengthens Romania’s circular economy. It also contributes directly to local economic development through job creation, training, and inclusive governance. Aligned UN Sustainable Development Goals: • SDG 4 – Quality Education • SDG 5 – Gender Equality • SDG 7 – Affordable and Clean Energy • SDG 8 – Decent Work and Economic Growth • SDG 13 – Climate Action Unlike projects that rely on slow natural processes or variable external factors, Aluminium Recycling – A Solution for Reducing CO₂ Emissions provides an immediate, scalable, and replicable model for industrial decarbonization. By investing in this project, buyers support a tangible, innovative solution with proven environmental, economic, and social benefits for a cleaner, greener future. Project Impacts and Benefits Environmental Benefits: Reduces CO₂ emissions by over 108,000 tCO₂e via aluminium recycling instead of primary production. Achieves up to 95% energy savings, totaling over 250,000 MWh, reducing fossil fuel demand. Cuts landfill waste volumes and lowers transport-related emissions through local, urban processing. Supports Romania’s circular economy by keeping valuable m
Red Flags
- The monitoring report and PDD disagree on the crediting period, which raises document consistency concerns.
- Extraction confidence is low, so at least one key source was poorly readable and important details may be missing.
Credit Vintages
| Issued | Retired | Available | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 44,289 | 4,895 | 39,394 | |
| 2023 | 57,053 | 4,300 | 52,753 | |
| 2024 | 7,435 | 0 | 7,435 | |
| Total | 108,777 | 9,195 | 99,582 |
Cosa migliorerebbe questo punteggio
- Publish a clear reconciliation note for the crediting period and any other document-level discrepancies.
- Provide complete MRV details, including the usage monitoring method, baseline reassessment timing, and explicit registry/claim status.
Questi suggerimenti indicano quali prove pubbliche aggiuntive potrebbero migliorare il livello di confidenza di questa valutazione. Non garantiscono un punteggio futuro più alto.
Risk Indicators
VVB-confirmed barrier test
Avoidance project; no reversals reported
Quantified 0% leakage deduction
Project baseline; reassessment timing missing
FPIC and grievance mechanism present
CORSIA/CCP status not stated
Where to buy
Marketplaces
+ Know where to buy this?
Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].
⚑ Dispute this rating
Registry Documents
monitoring
- SDG13_ ER Calculation_AS Metal_monitoring period 01.05.2022-13.02.2024_04.11.2024.xlsx
- Monitoring parameter no.6_SDG13_ ER Calculation_AS Metal_monitoring period 14.02.2024-31.12.2025_11.02.2026.xlsx
- 2024 AS Metal Aluminium Recycling CO2 Saving Project_Annual Report_22.12.2025.pdf
- Monitoring-Report_AS METAL_MP1.1_14.02.2024-31.12.2025_11.02.2026 .pdf
- Annual Report ANRE 2020 pg 126.pdf
- SDG-Impact-tool_AS METAL_monitoring period 14.02.2024-31.12.2025_11.02.2026.xlsx
- +6 more
Sei il proprietario di questo progetto?
Correzione metadati (gratuita)
Nome, paese, marketplace o link errati? Segnalacelo.
Non modifica lo score.
[email protected] →Rivalutazione con nuovi documenti
Hai documentazione aggiornata non ancora inclusa? Puoi richiedere un nuovo run della pipeline con i nuovi input.
Invia Documenti →