Skip to main content
ACRForest CarbonKENTUCKY, USGeneral Methodologyv2.1

Anew - Boone Forestry Project

ACR-596 ↗

#19of 99 in REDD+#88of 345 in United States#36of 147 in American Carbon Registry (ACR)

5.8/ 10
Integrity
5.5
Transparency
6.0
Claim Safety
6.0
Documentation
5.5

Audit Analysis

The Boone Forestry Project is a Kentucky improved-forest-management project with solid structural safeguards (18% buffer pool, 40% quantified leakage deduction, VVB-verified additionality, no reversal events), but the verification report reveals an unusually high volume of calculation and data-entry errors (30+ material findings, 17 corrective actions) that undermine confidence in the underlying MRV. The project-specific modeled baseline and the absence of FPIC or a documented grievance mechanism further limit the integrity score.

Red Flags

  • The November 2024 verification report lists more than 30 material findings and 17 corrective actions, including errors in baseline CO2e calculations, HWP weighting equations, storage-factor application, acreage figures, and uncertainty quantification — indicating a fragile MRV process that required extensive VVB intervention.
  • Free, Prior, and Informed Consent (FPIC) was not conducted and no grievance mechanism is documented in the extracted record, leaving a gap in community-safeguard compliance for a project operating on private forestland in Kentucky.
  • The monitoring report (Nov 2024) claimed 485,455 tCO2e while the VVB verified only 398,073 tCO2e — an 18% reduction that, while conservative, highlights a material discrepancy between the project's self-reported and independently verified figures.

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2019
69,72565,7943,931
2020
344,857290,56354,294
2021
408,97422,891386,083
2022
418,861152418,709
2023
123,8750123,875
2024
11,036011,036
Total1,377,328379,400997,928

Risk Indicators

Additionality

Combined test, VVB-confirmed

Permanence

18% buffer pool, 40-yr agreement, no reversals

Leakage

40% quantified deduction

Baseline

Project-specific, modeled

Safeguards

Safeguards mentioned; FPIC not conducted, no grievance mechanism

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status not stated

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-09-12General Methodology v2.1

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents