AS METAL, Romania Aluminum Recycling Project
Score Breakdown
Integrity
verified Additionality was confirmed by the VVB using a combined test in the validation/monitoring record, which is stronger than an unverified assertion.
missing Leakage treatment is only described as quantified, but the underlying justification is not detailed in the extracted record, and three corrective actions were required.
Transparency
verified The project identifies the Gold Standard registry, the VVB, the methodology version, and a defined monitoring period in the monitoring report.
missing Verified and claimed ERR totals are not stated, usage monitoring is not described, and the registry status is not found, limiting public traceability.
Claim Safety
verified The project uses a waste-recycling methodology and reports no reversal events, which lowers permanence-related claim risk for an avoidance activity.
missing Baseline reassessment timing is not stated, leakage justification is thin in the extracted record, and CORSIA/CCP status is not stated, leaving dual-claim risk unresolved.
Documentation
verified The record draws on multiple document types, including a validation report, monitoring report, PDD, and stakeholder consultation materials.
missing Extraction confidence is low, and several important fields are missing or not stated, including buffer pool coverage, verified ERR totals, and usage monitoring details.
Detailed Analysis
Integrity
The project benefits from VVB-confirmed additionality using a combined test, and the monitoring record reports no reversal events for this waste-management activity. The baseline is project-based, but the last reassessment date is not stated, and the extracted record shows three corrective actions, which reduces confidence in the robustness of the crediting case. Leakage is described as quantified, but the justification is not fully visible in the extracted facts.
Transparency
The documentation identifies the Gold Standard registry, the VVB, the methodology version, and the monitoring period, which helps traceability. However, the verified and claimed emission reduction totals are not stated, usage monitoring is not described, and the registry status is not found, so the public record appears incomplete. The low extraction confidence also suggests at least one key source was difficult to read.
Claim Safety
As an avoidance project under a recycling methodology, the project has a reasonable structural claim, and the absence of reported reversal events is favorable. Still, the baseline is project-specific rather than clearly standardized or recently reassessed, and the leakage explanation is only summarized as quantified without detail. CORSIA eligibility and CCP status are not stated, so dual-claim exposure cannot be ruled out.
Documentation
The evidence base includes multiple official document types, which is a positive sign, and the VVB is named. But the extraction confidence is low, several key fields are missing, and three corrective actions were required, all of which point to documentation gaps. The crediting period also appears inconsistent across documents, which further weakens confidence in the record quality.
Overall
I privileged the more recent monitoring report for the leakage and crediting-period values because it is later than the older monitoring record and should reflect the latest project status. I also privileged the validation report for the reversal statement because it is the higher-priority assurance document, while the stakeholder consultation note is less authoritative on that point. The contradictions around leakage justification and crediting period indicate reliability issues, and the not-found registry status further lowers confidence in the overall claim.
Audit Analysis
This is a waste-recycling avoidance project with VVB-confirmed additionality and no reported reversal events, which supports the core integrity case. However, the record has low extraction confidence, three corrective actions, missing key monitoring details, and a registry status that is not found, all of which weaken confidence in the claim.
Project Description
Aluminum Recycling - A Solution for CO2 Emission Reduction by AS METAL, Romania project is a state-of-the-art waste handling initiative located in Bucharest, Romania. Developed by AS METAL COM SRL, the project specializes in recycling post-consumer aluminum waste, transforming it into high-quality secondary raw materials ready for re-entry into the industrial circuit. By displacing the highly energy-intensive process of primary aluminum production from bauxite ore, the project significantly reduces greenhouse gas emissions. The facility has an output capacity of between 49,000 and 77,500 tons per year, depending on the type of waste processed. Environmental Benefits: The project's core environmental contribution is the reduction of an estimated 56,282 tonnes of CO2e annually. This is achieved by avoiding the emissions associated with primary aluminum production, a process that is approximately 8.4 times more polluting than recycling. The project also promotes a circular economy by diverting substantial amounts of aluminum waste from landfills, helping to address Romania's low national recycling rate and contributing to EU circular economy targets. Furthermore, the facility uses approximately 45% renewable energy in its annual consumption, enhancing its clean energy profile. Social and Community Benefits: The project serves as a model for sustainable development in Eastern Europe, generating significant local and regional benefits. It creates quality employment opportunities, with a total of 64 jobs, and fosters better working conditions. AS METAL demonstrates a strong commitment to gender equality, with women being promoted into managerial roles. The project actively invests in its workforce by providing skill development and training on recycling, climate change, and the circular economy. It also contributes to local municipal funds for social insurance, health, and pensions, supporting broader community development.
Red Flags
- The registry status is not found, so the project cannot be independently confirmed as active on the stated registry.
- Three corrective actions were required, and several key monitoring fields such as verified ERR totals, usage monitoring, and buffer pool coverage are not stated.
Credit Vintages
| Issued | Retired | Available | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 44,289 | 4,895 | 39,394 | |
| 2023 | 57,053 | 4,300 | 52,753 | |
| 2024 | 7,435 | 0 | 7,435 | |
| Total | 108,777 | 9,195 | 99,582 |
Cosa migliorerebbe questo punteggio
- Publish the verified and claimed emission reduction totals, along with the full leakage calculation and usage monitoring methodology.
- Resolve the registry status and document the latest crediting-period alignment, buffer treatment, and closure of the three corrective actions.
Questi suggerimenti indicano quali prove pubbliche aggiuntive potrebbero migliorare il livello di confidenza di questa valutazione. Non garantiscono un punteggio futuro più alto.
Risk Indicators
VVB-confirmed combined test
No reversals reported
Quantified but thin justification
Project baseline; reassessment not stated
FPIC and grievance mechanism present
CORSIA/CCP status not stated
Where to buy
Marketplaces
+ Know where to buy this?
Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].
⚑ Dispute this rating
Sei il proprietario di questo progetto?
Correzione metadati (gratuita)
Nome, paese, marketplace o link errati? Segnalacelo.
Non modifica lo score.
[email protected] →Rivalutazione con nuovi documenti
Hai documentazione aggiornata non ancora inclusa? Puoi richiedere un nuovo run della pipeline con i nuovi input.
Invia Documenti →