Bagepalli CDM Reforestation Programme
#49of 80 in ARR (afforestation)#878of 975 in India#1372of 1459 in CDM (UNFCCC)
Audit Analysis
The Bagepalli CDM Reforestation Programme is a 2008-era forestry project validated by TÜV SÜD that uses limited CERs to address non-permanence, but the validation report flagged 21 material findings and 28 corrective actions covering baseline, boundary, leakage, and monitoring deficiencies. No monitoring reports or verified emission reduction figures are available in the extracted record, and the low extraction confidence further limits confidence in the data. The project's structural safeguards (lCERs, VVB-verified additionality, FPIC) are present but are undermined by the volume of initial deficiencies and the absence of any post-validation monitoring evidence.
Red Flags
- 21 material findings and 28 corrective actions in the validation report indicate the initial PDD was significantly deficient in baseline, boundary, leakage, and monitoring design
- Leakage deduction is 0% with a 'deemed negligible' justification, yet the VVB explicitly required estimation of leakage from displacement of grazing, cropland, and fuelwood collection — the final position appears inconsistent with the VVB's requirement
- No monitoring reports or verified emission reduction figures are available; the only ERR figure is the ex-ante claim of 1,842,065 tCO2e over the full crediting period
- Low extraction confidence indicates at least one key document was poorly readable, reducing reliability of the extracted data
- Reversal events are marked as 'not addressed' in the extracted record, despite the project relying on lCERs as the non-permanence mechanism
- Buffer pool size not disclosed in available documents
Credit Vintages
No issuances recorded on the registry.
Risk Indicators
VVB-confirmed combined test
lCERs used; no buffer pool stated; reversals not addressed i
0% deduction; VVB required estimation; justification inconsi
Project-specific baseline; no reassessment date; 21 findings
FPIC conducted; safeguards mentioned; grievance mechanism no
CORSIA and CCP status not stated in available documents
⚑ Dispute this rating
Are you the project owner?
Metadata correction (free)
Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.
Does not modify the score.
[email protected] →Pipeline re-run with new documents
Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.
Submit Documents →