Skip to main content
CDMBiomass EnergyIndiaGeneral Methodologyv2.1

Biomass Based Cogeneration Units at Uttar Pradesh

CDM-0947 ↗

#221of 352 in Biomass#858of 975 in India#1324of 1459 in CDM (UNFCCC)

4.1/ 10
Integrity
4.0
Transparency
4.0
Claim Safety
4.5
Documentation
4.0

Audit Analysis

This CDM biomass cogeneration project in Uttar Pradesh, India, received VVB-confirmed additionality via a barrier test, but the validation report identified 13 material findings including a barriers analysis that lacked project-specific documentary evidence. The project-specific baseline, contradictory leakage treatment between the PDD and validation report, and numerous monitoring gaps (missing FNRB, usage monitoring method, and verified ERR figure) significantly undermine confidence in the credit quality. The project did over-deliver relative to its pro-rata ex-ante expectation, which is a positive signal for claim conservatism.

Red Flags

  • 13 material findings / corrective actions required at validation, including the barriers analysis lacking project-specific documentary evidence (CAR 4), undermining the additionality claim
  • Leakage treatment contradicts between documents: the validation report deems it negligible while the PDD does not address it at all
  • No verified ERR figure, FNRB value, or usage monitoring method found in the extracted record, leaving the MRV chain incomplete
  • No FPIC, grievance mechanism, or feedstock sustainability assessment documented despite safeguards being mentioned
  • One of the nine source documents is classified as 'unknown' type, reducing traceability

Credit Vintages

No issuances recorded on the registry.

Risk Indicators

Additionality

VVB-confirmed but barriers analysis lacked project-specific

Permanence

Avoidance project (grid displacement), no inherent reversal

Leakage

Deemed negligible in validation report but not addressed in

Baseline

Project-specific baseline, reassessment timing not stated

Safeguards

Safeguards and benefit sharing mentioned, but no FPIC or gri

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status not stated in available documents

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-08-26General Methodology v2.1

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents