Skip to main content
CCLand use (AFOLU)ColombiaGeneral Methodologyv2.1

Carbono La Puya y San Lorenzo

ECO-5 ↗

#68of 124 in Colombia#52of 99 in CerCarbono (CC)

4.9/ 10
Integrity
4.5
Transparency
5.5
Claim Safety
5.0
Documentation
4.5

Audit Analysis

A Colombian forestry project (Tectona grandis plantations) under the CerCarbono standard with a verified investment-test additionality and a 15% buffer pool, but significant gaps in safeguards (no FPIC, no grievance mechanism, safeguards not documented), a project-specific baseline, and a 0% leakage deduction justified only as 'deemed negligible.' Multiple material findings and corrective actions during verification, including planting-year inconsistencies and a draft-quality project document, reduce confidence in the underlying data.

Red Flags

  • FPIC was not conducted and no grievance mechanism is in place, despite the project involving land-use change in Colombia where indigenous and local community rights are a material concern.
  • Safeguards are not documented in the final verification report (the later-dated entry prevails over an earlier 'true' entry), leaving no evidence of social or environmental safeguard compliance.
  • Leakage deduction is 0% with only a 'deemed negligible' justification, which is thin for a forestry project where displaced demand or land-use change in adjacent areas is a realistic risk.
  • Reversal events are recorded as 'not addressed' in the final verification report, meaning the 15% buffer pool is the sole permanence safeguard and no explicit reversal-risk analysis is documented.
  • The project document (DoP) was submitted as a draft with editing errors, missing satellite imagery, and missing ICA plantation registration records, indicating weak initial documentation quality.

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2012
2,69002,690
2018
3350335
2019
1,63401,634
2020
1,63601,636
2021
1,63401,634
2022
1,15101,151
Total9,08009,080

Risk Indicators

Additionality

VVB-confirmed investment test

Permanence

reversals not explicitly addressed

Leakage

0% deduction, 'deemed negligible' only

Baseline

Project-specific baseline, no reassessment date

Safeguards

No FPIC, no grievance mechanism, not documented

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status not stated

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-09-01General Methodology v2.1

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents