CEMEX Colombia: Biomass project at Caracolito cement plant.
#76of 352 in Biomass#43of 124 in Colombia#658of 1459 in CDM (UNFCCC)#3of 6 in ACM0003
Audit Analysis
A CDM biomass energy project at a CEMEX cement plant with VVB-confirmed additionality and no reversal risk, but undermined by a project-specific baseline, a grid emission factor from 2006, numerous material findings questioning baseline validity and monitoring completeness, and a verified ERR that covers only about 29% of the pro-rata expectation for the elapsed monitoring period. The project is functional but carries moderate over-crediting risk and documentation gaps.
Red Flags
- Verified ERR of 21,009 tCO2e for the 6-month monitoring period is only ~29% of the pro-rata expectation (~73,400 tCO2e) derived from the 1,467,987 tCO2e lifetime PDD estimate, suggesting the ex-ante baseline may be overly optimistic or the project is underperforming
- Multiple material findings in the verification report question the validity of the baseline scenario (Scenario 1: continuation of current practice), the prevailing practice barrier, and whether fossil fuel costs were truly affected by the new biomass investment
- Grid emission factor of 0.439 tCO2/MWh is from 2006 and has not been updated, potentially overstating the displacement benefit
- Leakage is described as 'quantified' in the verification report but the actual deduction percentage is not stated in any available document
- Crediting period dates differ between the 2008 validation report (2008-07-01 to 2018-06-30) and the 2012 monitoring report (2009-04-01 to 2019-03-31), indicating a period amendment that is not fully transparent in the record
Credit Vintages
| Issued | Retired | Available | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | 142,542 | 0 | 142,542 | |
| 2013 | 21,010 | 0 | 21,010 | |
| Total | 163,552 | 0 | 163,552 |
Risk Indicators
VVB-confirmed but material findings question prevailing prac
Avoidance-type project; no reversal events reported
Described as quantified but deduction percentage not stated
Project-specific baseline; grid EF from 2006; validity quest
Safeguards mentioned and benefit sharing described, but FPIC
CORSIA eligibility and CCP status not stated in available do
⚑ Dispute this rating
Are you the project owner?
Metadata correction (free)
Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.
Does not modify the score.
[email protected] →Pipeline re-run with new documents
Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.
Submit Documents →