Vai al contenuto principale
GS avoidance D. Republic of the Congo Vintage 2021 Registry: Certified & crediting Documentazione completa General Methodology v2.0

Cookstove Project in DRC

GS-3454 ↗

5.3 / 10
Integrity
5.8
Transparency
5.0
Claim Safety
4.5
Documentation
6.0

Score Breakdown

Integrity

verified additionality confirmed by a VVB in a monitoring report (monitoring report, 2023-11-22)

missing buffer pool percentage not stated and leakage deduction of 0% despite contradictions in whether leakage was addressed

Transparency

verified named VVB (Earthood Services) and monitoring period provided (monitoring report, 2024-12-06)

missing total credits claimed not provided and multiple contradictions in ERR figures reduce traceability

Claim Safety

verified use of a local field FNRB method reported in the monitoring report (2024-11-14), which is preferable to a generic national default

missing inconsistent numerical reporting (FNRB and usage rate unit/decimal contradictions) increases over-crediting risk

Documentation

verified many documents used (34) including PDD, validation and monitoring reports and stakeholder consultation

missing extraction confidence is only medium and evidence set includes unknown/ambiguous documents

Detailed Analysis

Integrity

Additionality is reported as confirmed by the VVB in the monitoring report (monitoring report, 2023-11-22). The project uses a project-specific baseline under the stated methodology (TPDDTEC, version 3.1). No reversal events were reported and material findings or corrective actions are not reported. However, the buffer pool percentage is not stated and leakage is shown as a 0% deduction in the extracted record despite contradictory evidence about whether leakage was addressed, which weakens robustness.

Transparency

The VVB is named (Earthood Services) and monitoring period and crediting period are provided in the monitoring report (monitoring report, 2024-12-06 and 2024-11-14). However, the total credits claimed is not stated in available documents, and there are contradictions in total verified emission reductions across documents (100,150 vs 128,685), reducing transparency and auditability.

Claim Safety

The project reports a locally derived FNRB (monitoring report, 2024-11-14) and an in-person usage monitoring method (monitoring report, 2024-12-06), which are positive for accuracy. But major contradictions and likely unit/decimal reporting errors (FNRB 0.73998 vs 73.998; usage rate 0.7373 vs 73.7284) create material risk of over-crediting. Absence of stated buffer pooling for reversals adds to claim risk.

Documentation

There is a substantial document set (34 documents including validation, monitoring, PDD and stakeholder records) and the monitoring report is recent (doc_date 2024-12-06). Extraction confidence is medium, and one of the cited evidence items is 'unknown', indicating gaps in the record. No corrective actions or material findings were recorded, but the medium extraction confidence and the contradictions justify conservative scoring.

Overall

I privileged data from the most recent monitoring report values where conflicts existed because they are the most up-to-date project-level figures and are typically used for verification: for total verified ERR I privileged 100,150 (document dated 2024-12-05) over the earlier 128,685 (2024-11-11); for leakage I privileged the monitoring report statement that leakage was quantified (monitoring report, 2024-11-14) over an earlier validation report that did not address leakage (validation report, 2023-06-17); for FNRB I privileged 0.73998 from the monitoring report (2024-11-14) as the plausible decimal value over an earlier apparent unit error of 73.998 (monitoring report, 2023-06-13); for additionality I privileged the VVB-confirmation in the monitoring report (2023-11-22) over an earlier record indicating no confirmation (2023-06-29); for usage rate I privileged 0.737284 from the monitoring report (2024-12-06) over the implausible 73.7284 value (2024-12-05); for FNRB method and usage monitoring I privileged the later monitoring-report descriptions (local field and in-person, 2024-11-14 and 2024-12-06) over earlier references to national default or annual survey. These contradictions reduce confidence and I reflected that by lowering scores for transparency and claim safety. Note: extraction confidence was medium which also lowers documentation confidence. The overall weighted score is 5.3.

Audit Analysis

Moderate integrity and documentation: the project has VVB involvement, monitoring reports and stakeholder processes, but several contradictions in key numbers (ERR, FNRB, usage rates) and missing buffer/reversal provisioning weaken confidence. Transparency and claim safety are middling because of inconsistent reporting and missing registry totals.

Project Description

With more than 95% of people in the Democratic Republic of the Congo relying on biomass for cooking, and inefficient local charcoal production, clean cookstoves are crucial to slowing deforestation in the Congo basin. This project focuses on deploying highly efficient improved cookstoves that reduce fuel consumption by 61% in the DRC, thereby slowing deforestation and saving families money. These stoves also reduce indoor air pollution by 65%, leading to improved health outcomes, particularly for women and girls. The local production of charcoal, a common cooking fuel, is both unsustainable and costly. Additionally, using traditional and inefficient stoves leads to significant expenses for DRC families, with some spending up to $68 per month on fuel. Furthermore, the excessive smoke from these stoves poses serious health risks, contributing to over 3 million premature deaths annually, according to a study conducted by the Clean Cooking Alliance. In this context, BURN Manufacturing's project provides a solution by introducing the JIKOKOA, the world's most fuel-efficient biomass stove. By adopting the JIKOKOA, families can reduce their charcoal consumption by an impressive 61%, effectively slowing down deforestation and saving DRC households a total of $2.12 million to date. Additionally, this innovative stove reduces indoor air pollution by 65%, leading to reports of fewer illnesses among families who use it. The health benefits, combined with the savings in fuel expenses and time, contribute to a reduction in gender inequities and an overall improvement in the quality of life while also helping to preserve the country's forests. Through this project, BURN Manufacturing is providing a sustainable and life-changing solution to the pressing challenges faced by DRC families, offering them an opportunity for a better and healthier future. Project Impacts and Benefits The project has had the following impacts from 2020 to date. 20,000 clean cookstoves d

Red Flags

  • Contradictory verified emission reduction totals (100,150 vs 128,685) across documents
  • Inconsistent FNRB and usage figures (apparent unit/decimal errors: 0.73998 vs 73.998; 0.7373 vs 73.7284)
  • No buffer pool percentage stated and no explicit buffer/reversal provisioning documented

Credit Vintages

Issued Retired Available
2021
21,816 2,851 18,965
2022
91,650 5,657 85,993
2023
96,357 0 96,357
2024
33,054 0 33,054
Total 242,877 8,508 234,369

Cosa migliorerebbe questo punteggio

  • Publish a reconciled monitoring statement that resolves the ERR, FNRB and usage-rate unit/decimal contradictions and provides total credits claimed in the registry entry.
  • Disclose the buffer/reversal arrangement and explicitly document leakage quantification and any deductions in the verification report.

Questi suggerimenti indicano quali prove pubbliche aggiuntive potrebbero migliorare il livello di confidenza di questa valutazione. Non garantiscono un punteggio futuro più alto.

Risk Indicators

Additionality

VVB confirmed

Permanence

no buffer stated

Leakage

0% reported but inconsistent

Baseline

project baseline stated

Safeguards

FPIC & grievance noted

Double-claim

CORSIA/CCP status unclear

Where to buy

Marketplaces

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis Provenance Scored 2026-04-23 General Methodology v2.0 Documentazione completa

Sei il proprietario di questo progetto?

Correzione metadati (gratuita)

Nome, paese, marketplace o link errati? Segnalacelo.

Non modifica lo score.

[email protected]

Rivalutazione con nuovi documenti

Hai documentazione aggiornata non ancora inclusa? Puoi richiedere un nuovo run della pipeline con i nuovi input.

Invia Documenti