Skip to main content
CarbonMeld CarbonMeld Carbon Observatory
Tools
EN
ScoredGSEnergy Efficiency - DomesticSudanRegistry: RegisteredGS-ICS-KR

Darfur Efficient Cook-stove Project

Developer: Carbon Clear

GS-1554 ↗ · current registry ID: GS500

#316of 1735 in Industrial#536of 2172 in Gold Standard (GS)#3of 17 in GS-ICS-KR

Assessment

CarbonMeld document-based assessment

01020304 Overall 6.2 / 10 Dimension scores are locked — the faint arcs are empty tracks, not zero scores.

Scale 0–10 · method weights: integrity 35% · transparency 25% · claim safety 25% · documentation 15%.

Analysis

Darfur Efficient Cook-stove Project (Sudan) introduces improved cookstoves, water-treatment technologies or kitchen practices to reduce household or institutional energy emissions (LPG fired cook stoves) under Indicative Programme, Baseline, and Monitoring Methodology for Improved Cook-Stoves and Kitchen Regimes V.0133; registry status Registered (GS), 329,887 credits issued (vintages 2010–2020). The documents name Bureau Veritas Certification as validation body and TUV SUD South Asia Pvt Ltd (2020-01-01 – 2020-12-12) as verification body. The documents report 11,950 LPG fired cook stoves (2020-12-12). The latest verification report (2020-01-01 – 2020-12-12) verifies 46,709 tCO2e.

Red Flags

No red flags detected.

Findings

Risk Indicators

Additionality

🔒

Permanence

🔒

Leakage

🔒

Baseline

🔒

Safeguards

🔒

Double-claim

🔒

Risk indicator details are a Premium feature

Score Breakdown

Score factors per dimension are a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Detailed Analysis

The detailed per-dimension analysis is a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Evidence

Unlock the full analysis

Per-dimension scores, risk indicators, score factors, detailed analysis, and 8 registry documents (8 read).

€9+ VAT per month · card subscription, renews automatically until you cancel

Every rated project, PDF reports, API access, portfolio alerts and per-dimension scores with red-flag details in side-by-side comparisons (public-data comparison is free; fair use: 30 projects per day). Cancel any time from your account page. Crypto: $9 for one month, no automatic renewal.

Price + VAT · By subscribing or paying you accept the Terms of Use — the card subscription renews every month until you cancel; digital content, no refunds. How Premium works

Eligibility & market

What can you claim with this credit?

Four checks buyers ask about, from the registry and the Integrity Council (ICVCM).

  • Airlines (CORSIA)

    No CORSIA label on the registry

    Not usable for airlines' CORSIA obligations.

    Source: registry label

  • Integrity label (ICVCM CCP)

    No ICVCM information

    No CCP label and no ICVCM decision found for this project's methodology.

  • Removal or reduction

    Emission reduction or avoidance

    Prevents or reduces emissions — fits contribution claims, not SBTi neutralisation.

    Source: registry label

  • Paris Agreement (Article 6)

    Not published

    This registry does not publish Article 6 authorizations.

Information only, from public sources. Claim rules (CORSIA, SBTi, EU rules on green claims) change: check them before making a public claim. Since 27 September 2026, EU consumer rules do not allow “climate neutral” product claims based on offsets.

Registry labels last checked:2026-09-27

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2010
5695690
2011
12,26412,2640
2012
15,44715,4470
2013
16,72716,7270
2014
18,04918,0490
2015
26,68726,548139
2016
41,51040,680830
2017
48,15244,1004,052
2018
52,10252,1020
2019
51,67151,6710
2020
46,70926,71219,997
Total329,887304,86925,018

Where to buy

Got an offer for these credits? Check it against the registry →

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

Profile & governance

Analysis ProvenanceIndicative Programme, Baseline, and Monitoring Methodology for Improved Cook-Stoves and Kitchen Regimes V.0133

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected] →

Contest this rating

Something wrong in the analysis, or a registry document we have not used? Send us the link to the public source: you get a reference and an answer within 30 days.

Contest this rating →