Duerping Coal Mine Methane Utilization Project
#157of 189 in Methane#1010of 1084 in China#1354of 1459 in CDM (UNFCCC)#30of 35 in ACM0008
Audit Analysis
The Duerping Coal Mine Methane Utilization Project is a CDM methane capture-and-use project with a confirmed investment additionality test by TUV-Sued, but it is undermined by a direct contradiction over whether methane capture is legally required, persistent operational underperformance (gensets running at 60% load, flare blowers inoperable), a project-specific baseline with a 2006 grid emission factor, and a 0% leakage deduction justified only as 'deemed negligible.' The project consistently delivers below its ex-ante estimates, which limits over-crediting risk but signals weak ex-ante modelling.
Red Flags
- Contradiction between the 2010 monitoring report (capture legally required = true) and the 2009 validation report (capture legally required = false) directly undermines the additionality claim; if capture is a legal obligation, the project may not be additional.
- Multiple material findings document sustained operational failures: Engine no. 2 at 60% load for the entire monitoring period, flare blowers inoperable for ~7 weeks, SCADA connectivity failures, and swapped/abnormal sensor readings — indicating the MRV data stream is unreliable.
- Grid emission factor of 1.03025 tCO2/MWh is from 2006, more than a decade old at the time of the 2016 monitoring report, and no updated value is provided.
- Five contradictions across documents (baseline type, legal requirement, additionality test type, total ERR, crediting period dates) indicate poor internal consistency in the project record.
- Gas capture legally mandated — additionality in doubt
Credit Vintages
| Issued | Retired | Available | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | 104,509 | 0 | 104,509 | |
| 2011 | 328,546 | 0 | 328,546 | |
| 2013 | 463,449 | 0 | 463,449 | |
| 2014 | 498,496 | 0 | 498,496 | |
| 2016 | 528,276 | 0 | 528,276 | |
| 2017 | 453,808 | 0 | 453,808 | |
| Total | 2,377,084 | 0 | 2,377,084 |
Risk Indicators
VVB-confirmed investment test, but legal-requirement contrad
no reversal events reported but p
0% deduction justified only as 'deemed negligible' without q
Project-specific measured baseline; grid EF from 2006 is sta
Safeguards mentioned and benefit sharing described, but FPIC
CORSIA eligibility and CCP status not stated in available do
⚑ Dispute this rating
Are you the project owner?
Metadata correction (free)
Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.
Does not modify the score.
[email protected] →Pipeline re-run with new documents
Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.
Submit Documents →