Skip to main content
PURremovalSwedenGeneral Methodologyv2.1

ECOERA Millennium 1 Hammenhög Skånefrö

PUR-706975 ↗

#212of 352 in Biomass#4of 5 in Sweden#78of 111 in Puro.earth (PUR)

4.2/ 10
Integrity
4.0
Transparency
4.5
Claim Safety
3.5
Documentation
5.0

Audit Analysis

A Swedish biochar removal project with a confirmed investment-test additionality and a 9% buffer pool, but the verification report (Nov 2025) identified eight material findings including calculation errors, data-management gaps, and the auditor's inability to independently recalculate CO₂ removal. The ERR figure was corrected downward from 2,172 to 113.54 tCO₂ between two verification reports, and the permanence claim is contradicted (100 vs 1,000 years). These issues, combined with the absence of any stated leakage treatment and a project-specific baseline, place the project in a moderate-risk category.

Red Flags

  • The verification report (2025-11-04) lists eight material findings, including errors in CORC calculation formulas, biochar moisture-content input, sales-period boundaries, and the auditor's inability to independently calculate CO₂ removal due to 'sophisticated LCA templates'.
  • The verified ERR dropped from 2,172 tCO₂ (verification report, 2024-09-19) to 113.54 tCO₂ (verification report, 2025-11-04) — a ~95% reduction — indicating the initial claim was substantially overstated before correction.
  • Permanence claim is contradicted: 100 years in the 2024 verification report versus 1,000 years in the 2020 issuance document.
  • No leakage deduction or leakage justification is stated in any available document, despite biochar production involving feedstock sourcing and transport where displacement is plausible.
  • Twelve corrective actions were required, including the need to use actual metered electricity data instead of nominal manufacturer output in future periods.

Credit Vintages Exhausted

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2021
6036030
2023
2962960
2024
5185180
2025
1131130
Total1,5301,5300

Risk Indicators

Additionality

VVB-confirmed investment test

Permanence

claim contradicted (100 vs 1,000 yr)

Leakage

No deduction or justification stated

Baseline

Project-specific; reassessment timing not stated

Safeguards

Mentioned but FPIC and grievance mechanism not stated

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status not stated

Where to buy

Marketplaces

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-09-03General Methodology v2.1

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents