CarbonMeld CarbonMeld Carbon Observatory
Tools
ProjectsDevelopersComparePortfolioCCP trackerA–Z index BuyersCORSIA supplyCheck an offerAPI & MCP Method About the System Editorial Policy Score Your Project
EN
Workbench ProjectsDevelopersComparePortfolioCCP trackerA–Z index
← All projects
ScoredACRLivestock Waste ManagementWASHINGTON, USRegistry: TerminatedGeneral Methodologyv2.1

Edaleen Cow Power, LLC

Developer: Camco Offsets I, LLC

ACR-239 ↗

#1281of 1536 in Industrial#1163of 1689 in United States#618of 957 in American Carbon Registry (ACR)

Red flagTerminated

The project was ended by the registry or the developer (terminated, cancelled or not delivered). No new credits will be issued.

Only the vintages issued before the change (below) exist on the registry. Verify any resale claim against those vintages.

American Carbon Registry: “TERMINATED”

Assessment

CarbonMeld document-based assessment

01020304 Overall 4.1 / 10
Integrity 🔒 Transparency 🔒 Claim Safety 🔒 Documentation 🔒
Dimension scores are locked — the faint arcs are empty tracks, not zero scores.

Scale 0–10 · method weights: integrity 35% · transparency 25% · claim safety 25% · documentation 15%.

Scored2026-09-12high confidenceLatest verified monitoring: 2022-08-31

evidence:16/16registry documents analyzed · 3red flags

Generated by CarbonMeld Analysis Pipeline · Methodology · Editorial Policy · About the System
Download Report (PDF)

Analysis

Edaleen Cow Power is an ACR-registered livestock waste (biogas) project in Washington, US, verified by Agri-Waste Technology, Inc. The project has a defined methodology and active monitoring, but the extracted record lacks critical integrity parameters (baseline method, additionality test, leakage treatment) and the verification report flags three meter calibration non-conformances. The overall picture is of a functioning project with moderate MRV quality concerns and significant documentation gaps in the available record.

Red Flags

3 red flags detected — Unlock with Premium

Findings

Risk Indicators

Additionality

🔒

Permanence

🔒

Leakage

🔒

Baseline

🔒

Safeguards

🔒

Double-claim

🔒

Risk indicator details are a Premium feature

Score Breakdown

Score factors per dimension are a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Detailed Analysis

The detailed per-dimension analysis is a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Evidence

Eligibility & market

What can you claim with this credit?

Four checks buyers ask about, from the registry and the Integrity Council (ICVCM).

  • Airlines (CORSIA)

    No CORSIA label on the registry

    Not usable for airlines' CORSIA obligations.

    Source: registry label

  • Integrity label (ICVCM CCP)

    No ICVCM information

    No CCP label and no ICVCM decision found for this project's methodology.

  • Removal or reduction

    Emission reduction or avoidance

    Prevents or reduces emissions — fits contribution claims, not SBTi neutralisation.

    Source: project sector

  • Paris Agreement (Article 6)

    No Article 6 authorization

    No corresponding adjustment: the host country can also count this reduction towards its own target.

    Source: registry label

Information only, from public sources. Claim rules (CORSIA, SBTi, EU rules on green claims) change: check them before making a public claim. Since 27 September 2026, EU consumer rules do not allow “climate neutral” product claims based on offsets.

Registry labels last checked:2026-09-27

Credit Vintages Exhausted

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2015
8,74600
2016
8,39200
2017
8,42400
2018
7,39000
2019
5,34900
2021
1,79000
2022
2,6362,6360
Total42,7272,6360

Where to buy

Got an offer for these credits? Check it against the registry →

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating

Profile & governance

Analysis ProvenanceGeneral Methodologyv2.1
Methodology·Editorial Policy·About the System

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected] →

Contest this rating

Something wrong in the analysis, or a registry document we have not used? Send us the link to the public source: you get a reference and an answer within 30 days.

Contest this rating →