Skip to main content
CarbonMeld CarbonMeld Carbon Observatory
ScoredGSavoidanceKenyaVintage 2024Registry: Registered

Efficient and Clean Cooking Stoves For Households in Kenya

Developer: ECOA Climate Capital

GS-1559 ↗ · current registry ID: GS5642

#4of 278 in Cookstoves#7of 192 in Kenya#31of 2172 in Gold Standard (GS)

Assessment

CarbonMeld document-based assessment

01020304 Overall 8.1 / 10 Dimension scores are locked — the faint arcs are empty tracks, not zero scores.

Scale 0–10 · method weights: integrity 35% · transparency 25% · claim safety 25% · documentation 15%.

Analysis

Efficient and Clean Cooking Stoves For Households in Kenya (Kenya) distributes improved cookstoves or other technologies that reduce household thermal energy use under TPDDTEC Version 3.1; registry status Registered (GS), 2,948,369 credits issued (vintages 2016–2025). The documents name Carbon Check (India) Private Ltd as validator of the crediting-period renewal and Carbon Check (India) Private Ltd (2018-10-01 – 2020-05-31, 2022-04-01 – 2023-03-13), VKU Certification Private Limited (2025-01-31 – 2025-05-05) as verification bodies. The latest verification report (2025-01-31 – 2025-05-05) verifies 52,405 tCO2e.

Red Flags

No red flags detected.

Findings

Risk Indicators

Additionality

🔒

Permanence

🔒

Leakage

🔒

Baseline

🔒

Safeguards

🔒

Double-claim

🔒

Risk indicator details are a Premium feature

Score Breakdown

Score factors per dimension are a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Detailed Analysis

The detailed per-dimension analysis is a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Evidence

Unlock the full analysis

Per-dimension scores, risk indicators, score factors, detailed analysis, and 44 registry documents (43 read).

€9+ VAT per month · card subscription, renews automatically until you cancel

Every rated project, PDF reports, API access, portfolio alerts and per-dimension scores with red-flag details in side-by-side comparisons (public-data comparison is free; fair use: 30 projects per day). Cancel any time from your account page. Crypto: $9 for one month, no automatic renewal.

Price + VAT · By subscribing or paying you accept the Terms of Use — the card subscription renews every month until you cancel; digital content, no refunds. How Premium works

Eligibility & market

What can you claim with this credit?

Four checks buyers ask about, from the registry and the Integrity Council (ICVCM).

  • Airlines (CORSIA)

    No CORSIA label on the registry

    Not usable for airlines' CORSIA obligations.

    Source: registry label

  • Integrity label (ICVCM CCP)

    CCP-labelled credits

    The registry marks these credits with the Core Carbon Principles label of the Integrity Council.

    Source: registry label

  • Removal or reduction

    Emission reduction or avoidance

    Prevents or reduces emissions — fits contribution claims, not SBTi neutralisation.

    Source: registry label

  • Paris Agreement (Article 6)

    Not published

    This registry does not publish Article 6 authorizations.

Information only, from public sources. Claim rules (CORSIA, SBTi, EU rules on green claims) change: check them before making a public claim. Since 27 September 2026, EU consumer rules do not allow “climate neutral” product claims based on offsets.

Registry labels last checked:2026-09-27

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2016
157,226157,2260
2017
278,593278,295298
2018
293,547267,40826,139
2019
277,373274,4802,893
2020
414,682407,0437,639
2021
510,271510,18784
2022
516,426492,89923,527
2023
355,898347,8798,019
2024
91,94861,08030,868
2025
52,405052,405
Total2,948,3692,796,497151,872

Where to buy

Got an offer for these credits? Check it against the registry →

Marketplaces

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

Profile & governance

Analysis ProvenanceGeneral Methodologyv2.2

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected] →

Contest this rating

Something wrong in the analysis, or a registry document we have not used? Send us the link to the public source: you get a reference and an answer within 30 days.

Contest this rating →