Skip to main content
CDMLandfill gasChileACM0001

El Molle – Landfill gas (LFG) capture project

CDM-0170 ↗

#115of 189 in Methane#20of 31 in Chile#1155of 1459 in CDM (UNFCCC)#107of 159 in ACM0001

4.5/ 10
Integrity
5.2
Transparency
4.2
Claim Safety
4.3
Documentation
3.8

Audit Analysis

The El Molle LFG capture project has a VVB-confirmed investment additionality test and a project-specific baseline reassessed in 2021, but the validation report identified six material findings and two corrective actions related to emission factor calculations, waste composition evidence, and QA/QC transparency. No buffer pool, permanence mechanism, or monitoring data is documented, and the ERR figures differ substantially between the PDD and the validation report (likely reflecting different reporting periods). Overall, the project shows moderate methodological soundness with notable documentation and verification gaps.

Red Flags

  • Six material findings (CL 01–CL 06) and two corrective actions (CAR 01–CAR 02) in the validation report, including an incorrect operating-margin emission factor calculation and inconsistent MAP/PET parameters
  • ERR discrepancy: PDD reports 1,046,273 tCO₂e while the validation report confirms 149,468 tCO₂e — a roughly 7× difference that, while likely reflecting a full-crediting-period vs. annual basis, is not explicitly reconciled in the available documents
  • No buffer pool, permanence mechanism, or reversal-event data is documented for this 7-year crediting period
  • Leakage treatment is contradictory: the validation report deems leakage negligible (0% deduction) while another source references a 'quantified' approach
  • Low extraction confidence in the document analysis, with one of four source documents identified only as 'unknown'

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2008
67,165067,165
2010
47,016047,016
2011
83,723083,723
2013
286,2970286,297
2021
128,6510128,651
Total612,8520612,852

Risk Indicators

Additionality

VVB-confirmed investment test; capture not legally required

Permanence

mixed evidence / unresolved risk

Leakage

0% deemed negligible; contradictory source reference

Baseline

Project-specific modeled baseline; reassessed 2021

Safeguards

Safeguards and benefit-sharing mentioned; FPIC and grievance

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status not stated in available documents

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-08-28ACM0001

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents