Energia Verde Carbonization Project - Mitigation of Methane Emissions in the Charcoal Production of Grupo Queiroz Galvão, Maranhão, Brazil
#30of 211 in Brazil#416of 1459 in CDM (UNFCCC)
Audit Analysis
A CDM methane-capture project in Brazil's charcoal sector with VVB-confirmed additionality and no reversal events, but the first monitoring period delivered only about 36% of the pro-rata expected reductions, raising significant over-crediting concerns. The project-specific modeled baseline and a 0% leakage deduction with a 'deemed negligible' justification (contradicting the PDD's 'quantified' treatment) weaken the integrity case. Documentation is reasonably complete with high extraction confidence, but only one monitoring period is available.
Red Flags
- First monitoring period delivered only 80,771 tCO2e against a pro-rata expectation of ~226,845 tCO2e (35.6% of expected), indicating substantial under-delivery or over-estimation in the PDD
- Leakage treatment contradicts between the PDD (quantified) and the monitoring report (deemed negligible) with a 0% deduction applied
- Baseline methodology is inconsistent between the validation report (measured) and the monitoring report (modeled), and is project-specific rather than jurisdictional
- 47 Corrective Action Requests were raised during validation, suggesting significant initial design issues (all subsequently closed)
Credit Vintages
| Issued | Retired | Available | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 | 78,054 | 0 | 78,054 | |
| Total | 78,054 | 0 | 78,054 |
Risk Indicators
VVB-confirmed combined test; capture not legally required
Methane capture project; no reversal events reported
0% deduction; 'deemed negligible' contradicts PDD's 'quantif
Project-specific; measured vs modeled contradiction between
Safeguards mentioned and benefit sharing described; FPIC and
CORSIA and CCP status not stated; dual-channel risk unassess
⚑ Dispute this rating
Are you the project owner?
Metadata correction (free)
Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.
Does not modify the score.
[email protected] →Pipeline re-run with new documents
Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.
Submit Documents →