Skip to main content
CDMEE IndustryIndiaGeneral Methodologyv2.1

Energy efficiency improvement in power generation at Sajjan India Limited, Ankhleshwar, Gujarat

CDM-1454 ↗

#61of 1329 in Industrial#191of 975 in India#230of 1459 in CDM (UNFCCC)

6.0/ 10
Integrity
6.5
Transparency
5.5
Claim Safety
6.0
Documentation
6.0

Audit Analysis

A CDM energy-efficiency project at an Indian power plant with a VVB-confirmed investment additionality test and a reasonable negligible-leakage justification. The project delivered roughly 6.4× its pro-rata ex-ante expectation in the first monitoring period, indicating conservative crediting. Key gaps include a project-specific (non-jurisdictional) baseline, missing FNRB and usage-monitoring details, and 14 material findings (largely resolved) that point to initial documentation weaknesses.

Red Flags

  • The ex-ante ERR estimate (24,947 tCO₂e over 10 years) is far below the first monitoring-period delivery (32,149 tCO₂e over ~2 years), a 6.4× pro-rata over-delivery that, while conservative for buyers, raises questions about the robustness of the original ex-ante modelling.
  • The monitoring plan was found to be missing several required parameters (lignite consumption, emission factor, NCV, steam generation, etc.) at the time of the 2010 verification, requiring a corrective action to revise the plan.
  • Baseline method is described as 'project-specific' in the monitoring report but 'jurisdictional' in an appendix, creating ambiguity about the baseline construction approach.

Credit Vintages

No issuances recorded on the registry.

Risk Indicators

Additionality

VVB-confirmed investment test

Permanence

EE project, no reversals, substitution addressed

Leakage

0% with reasonable on-site justification

Baseline

Project-specific, not jurisdictional

Safeguards

Mentioned, benefit sharing described, FPIC/grievance not sta

Double-claim

CORSIA/CCP status not stated

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-08-29General Methodology v2.1

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents