Skip to main content
CDMEE serviceIndiaAMS-II.E

Energy efficiency measures at Mindspace, Hyderabad, Building no. 12A, 12B, 12C& 20 of Sundew Properties Ltd.

CDM-10406 ↗

#598of 1329 in Industrial#603of 975 in India#888of 1459 in CDM (UNFCCC)#7of 15 in AMS-II.E

4.9/ 10
Integrity
5.5
Transparency
4.0
Claim Safety
5.5
Documentation
4.0

Audit Analysis

A CDM energy-efficiency project (high-efficiency pumps) at a commercial building in Hyderabad with a confirmed investment-test additionality and a reasonable 0% leakage assumption. However, the validation report surfaced multiple PDD inconsistencies—including grid emission-factor calculation errors and methodological inconsistencies flagged by the CDM Secretariat—and two corrective actions remained open at the time of the report. The absence of any monitoring-period data, usage-tracking method, or post-validation verification limits confidence in the 41,000 tCO₂e claim.

Red Flags

  • Two corrective actions were still open at validation: the project proponent was required to substantiate the grid emission-factor approach per Tool v5.0 and to align methodological choices between PDD sections B.6.1 and B.6.3.
  • The CDM Secretariat independently noted an inconsistency in the grid emission-factor calculation regarding technical grid losses, suggesting the baseline may have been overstated.
  • No monitoring-period data, usage-monitoring method, or verified usage rate was found in any available document, leaving the 41,000 tCO₂e figure unverified against actual performance.
  • Low extraction confidence indicates at least one key document was poorly readable, reducing reliability of the extracted record.

Credit Vintages

No issuances recorded on the registry.

Risk Indicators

Additionality

VVB-confirmed investment test

Permanence

No reversal data; EE project has low but untested reversal r

Leakage

0% deemed negligible; reasonable for on-site pump efficiency

Baseline

Project-specific modeled baseline; grid-EF calculation quest

Safeguards

Safeguards mentioned and benefit sharing described; no FPIC

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status not stated in available documents

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-08-29AMS II.E1

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents