Skip to main content
CDMMethane avoidanceColombiaAM0013

FEDEPALMA SECTORAL CDM UMBRELLA PROJECT FOR METHANE CAPTURE, FOSSIL FUEL DISPLACEMENT AND COGENERATION OF RENEWABLE ENERGY

CDM-1942 ↗

#1543of 1935 in Renewable energy#110of 124 in Colombia#1330of 1459 in CDM (UNFCCC)

4.1/ 10
Integrity
3.5
Transparency
4.0
Claim Safety
4.5
Documentation
5.0

Audit Analysis

This CDM umbrella project for methane capture at Colombian palm-oil mills delivered only about 9% of its ex-ante emission-reduction estimate over the full crediting period, with just 5 of 32 registered plants active during the last monitoring window. A critical contradiction between the PDD (15% quantified leakage) and the monitoring report (0%, deemed negligible) undermines confidence in the leakage treatment, and eight material findings plus four corrective actions signal persistent data-quality and compliance gaps. The project is not over-crediting, but the baseline appears overly optimistic and the documentation record is internally inconsistent.

Red Flags

  • Leakage deduction dropped from 15% (quantified in the PDD, 2009) to 0% (deemed negligible in the monitoring report, 2020) with no documented re-justification
  • Only 5 of 32 registered extraction plants implemented project activities during the monitoring period, yet credits were issued against the full 32-plant baseline
  • Cumulative emission reductions (453,651 tCO2e) represent only ~9% of the ex-ante estimate (5,299,466 tCO2e), suggesting the baseline was substantially over-estimated
  • Internal contradiction within the same monitoring report on whether methane capture is legally required (stated as both true and false)
  • Flare efficiency was 50% (open flaring) versus the 90% assumed in the PDD, inflating project emissions and reducing net reductions

Credit Vintages

No issuances recorded on the registry.

Risk Indicators

Additionality

VVB-confirmed but test type contradicted

Permanence

Methane capture – no inherent reversal risk

Leakage

PDD 15% vs monitoring 0% – unexplained shift

Baseline

Project-specific, mixed, 9% delivery

Safeguards

Mentioned but FPIC and grievance not documented

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status not stated

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-08-29AM0013

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents