Skip to main content
CDMLandfill gasIsraelACM0001

Ganey Hadas Landfill Gas to Renewable Electricity project

CDM-2465 ↗

#139of 189 in Methane#6of 8 in Israel#1300of 1459 in CDM (UNFCCC)#121of 159 in ACM0001

4.2/ 10
Integrity
4.8
Transparency
3.8
Claim Safety
4.2
Documentation
3.5

Audit Analysis

The Ganey Hadas landfill gas project in Israel was verified by DNV under CDM methodology ACM0001 v8.1, with a combined additionality test confirmed. However, the project record is significantly undermined by a corrupted source document, five inter-document contradictions (including a critical flip on whether gas capture was legally required), 20 material findings in the verification report, and the absence of verified emission reduction figures. The project presents moderate-to-high data reliability risk.

Red Flags

  • Contradiction on whether landfill gas capture was legally required: the 2010 monitoring report states it was required, while the 2011 report states it was not — this directly undermines the additionality claim if the earlier value is correct
  • At least one key source document is described as corrupted binary data with garbled characters, limiting the reliability of extracted facts
  • 20 material findings were raised during verification, including 3 corrective actions (host-country approval letter, project start-date justification, IRR spreadsheet corrections), indicating significant PDD gaps
  • No verified emission reduction figure (total_err_verified) is available in the extracted record, making over- or under-crediting impossible to assess
  • Crediting period start and end dates differ between the validation report (2009-06-01 to 2015-07-31) and the PDD (2009-07-06 to 2016-07-06)

Credit Vintages

No issuances recorded on the registry.

Risk Indicators

Additionality

VVB-confirmed but capture-legality contradiction unresolved

Permanence

no reversal events reported

Leakage

0% deduction deemed negligible; justification not quantified

Baseline

Project-specific, mixed measured/modeled; no reassessment da

Safeguards

Safeguards and benefit sharing mentioned; FPIC and grievance

Double-claim

CCP and CORSIA status not stated in available documents

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-08-29ACM0001

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents