Skip to main content
GSEnergy Efficiency - DomesticCongo, the Democratic Republic of theGeneral Methodologyv2.1

GS10789 VPA7: Efficient and Clean Cooking for households in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC)

GS-3456 ↗ · current registry ID: GS11435

#494of 1329 in Industrial#6of 9 in Congo, the Democratic Republic of the#791of 1801 in Gold Standard (GS)

5.0/ 10
Integrity
5.5
Transparency
4.8
Claim Safety
4.5
Documentation
4.8

Audit Analysis

A Gold Standard household cookstove project in DRC with VVB-confirmed additionality, FPIC, and a quantified 5% leakage deduction, but undermined by ten cross-document contradictions in key parameters (fNRB, usage rates, ERR figures, crediting periods) and an extensive list of unresolved clarifications and corrective actions. The verified ERR of 643,466 tCO₂e for the monitoring period appears to cover all existing VPAs while the claimed 358,068 tCO₂e is specific to VPA7, making a direct pro-rata comparison unreliable and raising transparency concerns about scope delineation.

Red Flags

  • Verified ERR (643,466 tCO₂e, verification report 2025-05) is approximately 9× the pro-rata expectation derived from the VPA7 ex-ante estimate (358,068 tCO₂e over 5 years → ~71,614 tCO₂e/year); while likely a scope mismatch (all VPAs vs. VPA7 only), the documents do not clearly delineate per-VPA figures, preventing independent verification of over- or under-crediting.
  • fNRB value differs by ~15% between the verification report (0.73998) and the validation report (0.64), with no documented justification for the change; a higher fNRB inflates claimed emissions reductions.
  • Ten cross-document contradictions identified across leakage, usage rates, ERR, fNRB, additionality test type, reversal events, and crediting periods, indicating inconsistent data management across the project's document set.
  • No buffer pool percentage is stated in any available document, leaving permanence risk unquantified despite the project-specific baseline.
  • Extensive list of 20+ clarifications and corrective actions (CLs and CARs) spanning SDG reporting, additionality scope, double-counting prevention, and funding source accuracy, suggesting the project documentation required substantial remediation before verification.

Credit Vintages

No issuances recorded on the registry.

Risk Indicators

Additionality

VVB-confirmed combined test

Permanence

no reversals reported

Leakage

5% quantified deduction

Baseline

Project-specific; reassessed 2023

Safeguards

FPIC, grievance, benefit sharing documented

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status not stated

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-09-02General Methodology v2.1

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents