GS12215 GS12216 RVPA-1 Improved cookstoves and healthy lives in Nepal – VPA 2
GS-4426 ↗ · current registry ID: GS12217
#65of 1329 in Industrial#5of 101 in Nepal#155of 1801 in Gold Standard (GS)
Audit Analysis
A Gold Standard improved cookstove project in Nepal with verified additionality (investment test) and a quantified 5% leakage deduction, but weakened by a project-specific baseline, absence of a stated buffer pool, unaddressed reversal risk, and a 10.22% variance between initial and final emission reductions that exceeded the materiality threshold. The first monitoring period delivered approximately 88% of the pro-rata expectation, indicating modest under-delivery. Multiple contradictions between documents—particularly on crediting period length and monitoring method—reduce confidence in the data record.
Red Flags
- 10.22% variance between initial ER estimate (9,586 tCO₂e) and final verified value (8,607 tCO₂e) exceeded the 10% materiality threshold per GS VVS paragraph 9.6.3, as noted in the verification report
- Crediting period contradiction: the validation report (Feb 2025) states a 15-year period (2023-06-13 to 2038-06-12) while the monitoring report (Nov 2025) states a 5-year period (2023-10-06 to 2028-10-05); the more recent monitoring report is privileged but the discrepancy is unresolved
- Buffer pool percentage is not stated in any available document, and reversal events are explicitly marked as not addressed, leaving permanence risk unquantified for a cookstove project where household reversion is a known risk
- Multiple findings raised during verification: two FARs, two CLs, and one CAR, including a requirement to establish a procedure to avoid double counting of VPAs across registries
Credit Vintages
| Issued | Retired | Available | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2,046 | 1,997 | 49 | |
| 2024 | 6,561 | 0 | 6,561 | |
| Total | 8,607 | 1,997 | 6,610 |
Risk Indicators
VVB-confirmed investment test
reversal not addressed
5% quantified deduction
Project-specific; no reassessment date
FPIC, grievance mechanism, benefit sharing documented
CORSIA not stated; CCP not mentioned; FAR on double-counting raised
⚑ Dispute this rating
Are you the project owner?
Metadata correction (free)
Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.
Does not modify the score.
[email protected] →Pipeline re-run with new documents
Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.
Submit Documents →