Skip to main content
GSEnergy Efficiency - DomesticNepalGeneral Methodologyv2.1

GS12215 VPA-1 Improved cookstoves and healthy lives in Nepal

GS-4378 ↗ · current registry ID: GS12216

#308of 1329 in Industrial#22of 101 in Nepal#506of 1801 in Gold Standard (GS)

5.3/ 10
Integrity
4.5
Transparency
6.0
Claim Safety
5.5
Documentation
6.0

Audit Analysis

This Gold Standard cookstove project in Nepal has VVB-verified additionality and a quantified 5% leakage deduction, but is undermined by eight material findings—including a 17.37% variance exceeding the materiality threshold, baseline stoves still in use alongside project stoves, and a 15.6-percentage-point gap between assumed (90%) and verified (75.41%) usage rates. The project delivered approximately 89% of the pro-rata ex-ante expectation for the first monitoring period, which is slightly conservative but within a reasonable range. Several corrective actions remain open, and permanence and reversal risk are not adequately addressed in the available documentation.

Red Flags

  • 17.37% variance between initial and final ER estimates exceeded the 10% materiality threshold, attributed to undisclosed baseline stove usage (verification report, Dec 2025)
  • Baseline stoves observed in use alongside project stoves in several sampled households, directly challenging the additionality claim (verification report)
  • Usage rate assumed at 90% in the ex-ante estimate but verified at only 75.41%, a 15.6-percentage-point gap that inflates the original credit estimate (monitoring report vs. PDD)
  • Reversal events are not addressed and no buffer pool percentage is stated in any available document, leaving permanence risk unquantified
  • FAR #02 requires the project developer to establish a procedure to avoid double counting of VPAs across registries, indicating an unresolved double-claiming risk

Credit Vintages Exhausted

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2023
6,1236,1230
2024
1,8801,8800
Total8,0038,0030

Risk Indicators

Additionality

VVB-confirmed but challenged by material findings

Permanence

mixed evidence / unresolved risk

Leakage

5% quantified deduction applied

Baseline

Project-specific; reassessment timing not stated

Safeguards

FPIC and grievance mechanism present but awareness gaps noted

Double-claim

CCP/CORSIA status unstated; FAR #02 flags cross-registry risk

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-09-10General Methodology v2.1

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents