Vai al contenuto principale
GS Energy Efficiency - Domestic Malawi Documentazione completa General Methodology v2.0

GS1247 VPA 100 Improved Kitchen Regimes Multi-Country PoA - Kasungu Boreholes, Malawi

GS-1476 ↗

3.5 / 10
Integrity
4.2
Transparency
2.4
Claim Safety
4.0
Documentation
2.8

Score Breakdown

Integrity

verified The PDD states a quantified leakage deduction of 0% and describes the leakage treatment as quantified.

missing Additionality was not confirmed by a verifier, and reversal risk is not addressed in the extracted record.

Transparency

verified The PDD identifies the Gold Standard registry and includes a defined crediting period from 2016-02-12 to 2023-02-11.

missing No monitoring period, verified emission reductions, or VVB name were found in the available documents.

Claim Safety

verified The project includes FPIC, a grievance mechanism, and benefit sharing, which helps reduce social claim risk.

missing The baseline is project-specific rather than clearly standardized, and the assumed usage rate of 0.85 was not verified.

Documentation

verified Safeguards are explicitly mentioned in the PDD, including FPIC and a grievance mechanism.

missing Only one document was used, and key fields such as verified emissions, buffer pool, and VVB identity were not found.

Detailed Analysis

Integrity

The PDD describes the methodology for displacing decentralized thermal energy consumption and uses a project baseline, but no additionality test is stated and no VVB confirmation is available. Leakage is treated with a quantified deduction of 0%, which is a positive sign, yet permanence is weakly evidenced because reversal events are noted as not addressed and no buffer pool is reported.

Transparency

Transparency is limited because the extracted record contains only the PDD, with no monitoring report, no verified emission totals, and no VVB name. The registry is identified as Gold Standard and the crediting period is stated, but the absence of a monitoring period and verification details leaves the public audit trail incomplete.

Claim Safety

Claim safety is mixed. The project has social safeguards, including FPIC, a grievance mechanism, and benefit sharing, but the baseline is project-specific and the assumed usage rate of 0.85 was not verified in the available documents. The national default FNRB value of 0.92 is stated, but without monitoring evidence the over-crediting risk remains material.

Documentation

Documentation quality is weak because only one document was used and several core fields are missing from the extracted record. The extraction confidence is high, but the record still lacks VVB identity, verified emissions, buffer pool information, and monitoring-period evidence, which limits confidence in the file completeness.

Overall

The project shows some procedural strengths, especially documented safeguards and a quantified leakage treatment, but the evidence package is too thin to support a high-confidence quality assessment. There are no contradictions in the extracted record, so no document hierarchy issue needed to be resolved; however, the absence of verification and monitoring documents is a major reliability gap. Because additionality is not verifier-confirmed and permanence is not well evidenced, the overall score remains moderate.

Audit Analysis

The project has some positive safeguards and a quantified leakage treatment, but the evidence base is thin because only the PDD was available. Key quality questions remain around additionality, permanence, and whether the assumed usage rate was ever verified in monitoring.

Project Description

Developer: CO2balance UK ltd Type: Energy Efficiency - Domestic Size: Micro scale Methodology: GS TPDDTEC v 1. Crediting period: 2016-02-12 → 2023-02-11 Estimated annual credits: 10000 tCO2e SDGs: Goal 6: Clean Water and Sanitation, Goal 13: Climate Action, Goal 3: Good Health and Well-Being

Red Flags

  • No VVB verification evidence was available for additionality, and the project-specific baseline was not shown to have been reassessed.
  • Only one document was used, with no monitoring report, no verified emission reductions, and no public registry completeness evidence in the extracted record.

Credit Vintages

Issued Retired Available
2016
8,877 8,877 0
2017
10,000 10,000 0
2018
10,000 0 10,000
2019
10,000 8,723 1,277
2020
9,435 9,435 0
2021
9,229 9,045 184
2022
9,892 9,696 196
2023
693 680 13
Total 68,126 56,456 11,670

Cosa migliorerebbe questo punteggio

  • Provide the verification and monitoring reports showing verified emission reductions, VVB identity, and any corrective actions.
  • Document additionality testing, baseline reassessment, and permanence arrangements such as buffer pool treatment or explicit reversal management.

Questi suggerimenti indicano quali prove pubbliche aggiuntive potrebbero migliorare il livello di confidenza di questa valutazione. Non garantiscono un punteggio futuro più alto.

Risk Indicators

Additionality

No verifier-confirmed additionality found

Permanence

No buffer pool or reversal treatment shown

Leakage

Leakage quantified at 0%

Baseline

Project baseline stated, reassessment not shown

Safeguards

FPIC and grievance mechanism documented

Double-claim

CORSIA/CCP status not stated

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis Provenance Scored 2026-04-14 General Methodology v2.0 Documentazione completa

Sei il proprietario di questo progetto?

Correzione metadati (gratuita)

Nome, paese, marketplace o link errati? Segnalacelo.

Non modifica lo score.

[email protected]

Rivalutazione con nuovi documenti

Hai documentazione aggiornata non ancora inclusa? Puoi richiedere un nuovo run della pipeline con i nuovi input.

Invia Documenti