Skip to main content
GSEnergy Efficiency - DomesticEritreaGeneral Methodologyv2.1

GS1247 VPA 45 Eritrean District Boreholes

GS-791 ↗ · current registry ID: GS4422

#890of 1329 in Industrial#31of 38 in Eritrea#1306of 1801 in Gold Standard (GS)

4.5/ 10
Integrity
4.2
Transparency
4.8
Claim Safety
4.0
Documentation
5.2

Audit Analysis

This Gold Standard borehole project in Eritrea has VVB-confirmed additionality and no reversal events, but is undermined by extensive material findings including double-counting of users at proximate boreholes, misapplication of the Wp,y parameter, and multiple unresolved contradictions across documents. The leakage treatment is inconsistent (0% with 'quantified' justification in one report, 'deemed negligible' in another, and 5% in the PDD), and the fNRB value differs between the monitoring report (0.97) and the PDD (0.85). Numerous corrective actions and forward action requests remain open, indicating ongoing data-quality concerns.

Red Flags

  • Double counting of users identified for boreholes ZMA 054/055 and ZMA 056/057 in close proximity; resolved by removing duplicates but raises questions about initial crediting accuracy
  • Wp,y value of 0.4 kg/L was applied for improved stoves while survey data shows only 28% of users use a three-stone fire stove, indicating over-crediting in the baseline
  • Ten contradictions across documents including ERR figures (37,380 vs 33,064), fNRB value (0.97 vs 0.85), leakage justification, and crediting period dates (2015–2022 vs 2025–2030)
  • Multiple open Forward Action Requests (FAR 01–05) covering SDG indicators, fNRB reporting, and monitoring justification remain unresolved
  • Repair times for boreholes range from 2–3 days to weeks due to logistical issues, creating a gap in emission reductions during downtime

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2015
1261260
2016
10,00010,0000
2017
10,0009,800200
2018
8498490
2019
9,1519,1510
2020
6,8396,8390
2021
6,8893,3153,574
2022
8,5663,2575,309
Total52,42043,3379,083

Risk Indicators

Additionality

VVB-confirmed combined test

Permanence

repair gaps up to weeks

Leakage

0% deduction but contradictory justifications across documents

Baseline

Project-specific baseline; fNRB method contradicted

Safeguards

FPIC, grievance mechanism, benefit sharing documented

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status not stated

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-09-10General Methodology v2.1

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents