GS1247 VPA 45 Eritrean District Boreholes
GS-791 ↗ · current registry ID: GS4422
#890of 1329 in Industrial#31of 38 in Eritrea#1306of 1801 in Gold Standard (GS)
Audit Analysis
This Gold Standard borehole project in Eritrea has VVB-confirmed additionality and no reversal events, but is undermined by extensive material findings including double-counting of users at proximate boreholes, misapplication of the Wp,y parameter, and multiple unresolved contradictions across documents. The leakage treatment is inconsistent (0% with 'quantified' justification in one report, 'deemed negligible' in another, and 5% in the PDD), and the fNRB value differs between the monitoring report (0.97) and the PDD (0.85). Numerous corrective actions and forward action requests remain open, indicating ongoing data-quality concerns.
Red Flags
- Double counting of users identified for boreholes ZMA 054/055 and ZMA 056/057 in close proximity; resolved by removing duplicates but raises questions about initial crediting accuracy
- Wp,y value of 0.4 kg/L was applied for improved stoves while survey data shows only 28% of users use a three-stone fire stove, indicating over-crediting in the baseline
- Ten contradictions across documents including ERR figures (37,380 vs 33,064), fNRB value (0.97 vs 0.85), leakage justification, and crediting period dates (2015–2022 vs 2025–2030)
- Multiple open Forward Action Requests (FAR 01–05) covering SDG indicators, fNRB reporting, and monitoring justification remain unresolved
- Repair times for boreholes range from 2–3 days to weeks due to logistical issues, creating a gap in emission reductions during downtime
Credit Vintages
| Issued | Retired | Available | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 126 | 126 | 0 | |
| 2016 | 10,000 | 10,000 | 0 | |
| 2017 | 10,000 | 9,800 | 200 | |
| 2018 | 849 | 849 | 0 | |
| 2019 | 9,151 | 9,151 | 0 | |
| 2020 | 6,839 | 6,839 | 0 | |
| 2021 | 6,889 | 3,315 | 3,574 | |
| 2022 | 8,566 | 3,257 | 5,309 | |
| Total | 52,420 | 43,337 | 9,083 |
Risk Indicators
VVB-confirmed combined test
repair gaps up to weeks
0% deduction but contradictory justifications across documents
Project-specific baseline; fNRB method contradicted
FPIC, grievance mechanism, benefit sharing documented
CORSIA and CCP status not stated
⚑ Dispute this rating
Are you the project owner?
Metadata correction (free)
Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.
Does not modify the score.
[email protected] →Pipeline re-run with new documents
Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.
Submit Documents →