Skip to main content
GSEnergy Efficiency - DomesticMozambiqueGeneral Methodologyv2.1

GS1247 VPA 53: Improved Cook Stoves in Chamanculo C, Maputo (Mozambique), phase III

GS-825 ↗ · current registry ID: GS4612

#618of 1329 in Industrial#15of 51 in Mozambique#944of 1801 in Gold Standard (GS)

4.9/ 10
Integrity
5.0
Transparency
5.0
Claim Safety
5.0
Documentation
4.5

Audit Analysis

A Gold Standard cook-stove project in Maputo, Mozambique, with a combined additionality test and FPIC in place, but undermined by ten cross-document contradictions (leakage treatment, FNRB method, crediting period, additionality verification), an extensive list of 30+ corrective actions, and a monitoring period that does not align with either stated crediting period. The verified usage rate (79%) is below the assumed 90%, which is conservative, but the project-specific baseline and inconsistent leakage treatment limit confidence in the claimed reductions.

Red Flags

  • Ten contradictions across documents, including leakage deduction (0% vs 5%), FNRB method (national default vs local field), additionality verification (confirmed vs not confirmed), and crediting period (2014–2021 vs 2025–2030)
  • Monitoring period (Jan 2023 – Dec 2024) does not fall within either stated crediting period, making the pro-rata ERR comparison unreliable
  • 30+ corrective actions required, covering additionality of retroactive VPAs, baseline survey data, efficiency claims, and monitoring plan gaps
  • Leakage deduction of 0% with 'deemed negligible' justification is inconsistent with the 2023 PDD, which quantified a 5% deduction
  • Gold Standard is listed as both the registry and the VVB, raising independence concerns

Credit Vintages Exhausted

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2014
1,6911,6910
2015
9,8429,8420
2016
2,2652,2650
Total13,79813,7980

Risk Indicators

Additionality

Combined test present but verification status contradicted across documents

Permanence

Energy-efficiency project; no sequestration; no reversal events reported

Leakage

0% deduction with 'deemed negligible' justification contradicted by 5% in 2023 PDD

Baseline

Project-specific baseline; reassessed 2024; less robust than jurisdictional

Safeguards

FPIC conducted; grievance mechanism present; benefit sharing described

Double-claim

CORSIA eligibility not stated; CCP status not mentioned; dual-channel risk unassessed

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-09-03General Methodology v2.1

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents