Skip to main content
GSEnergy Efficiency - DomesticKenyaGeneral Methodologyv2.1

GS1366 VPA 15 Kilifi Borehole Rehabilitation Project

GS-1568 ↗ · current registry ID: GS7372

#897of 1329 in Industrial#107of 157 in Kenya#1315of 1801 in Gold Standard (GS)

4.5/ 10
Integrity
5.5
Transparency
4.5
Claim Safety
3.0
Documentation
5.0

Audit Analysis

The Kilifi Borehole Rehabilitation Project has a reasonable safeguards framework (FPIC, grievance mechanism, benefit sharing) and no material findings, but suffers from a critical over-crediting signal: the monitoring report claims 84,658 credits against an ex-ante lifetime estimate of only 50,000. The project-specific baseline, unconfirmed VVB, and contradictory leakage justifications further weaken confidence in the integrity and claim safety of the credits.

Red Flags

  • Claimed ERR of 84,658 (monitoring report, 2020) exceeds the ex-ante lifetime estimate of 50,000 (PDD) by 69%, indicating potential over-crediting
  • Crediting period is stated as 2014–2028 in the PDD but 2018–2024 in the monitoring report, a fundamental inconsistency in project scope
  • VVB name is not identified in any available document, leaving additionality verification unconfirmed
  • Leakage justification is contradictory: the PDD describes it as 'quantified' while the monitoring report states it was 'deemed negligible' with a 0% deduction

Credit Vintages Exhausted

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2019
7,6167,6160
Total7,6167,6160

Risk Indicators

Additionality

Investment test present but VVB unconfirmed; test type inconsistent across PDD versions

Permanence

no reversal events reported but permanence risk unaddressed

Leakage

0% deduction with contradictory justification (deemed negligible vs quantified)

Baseline

Project-specific baseline; no reassessment date recorded

Safeguards

FPIC, grievance mechanism, and benefit sharing all documented

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status both not stated; dual-channel risk unassessed

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-09-03General Methodology v2.1

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents