Skip to main content
GSEnergy Efficiency - DomesticMyanmarGeneral Methodologyv2.1

GS1729 - Myanmar Stoves Campaign - Soneva in Myanmar - VPA No. 004

GS-1494 ↗ · current registry ID: GS5660

#835of 1329 in Industrial#17of 25 in Myanmar#1235of 1801 in Gold Standard (GS)

4.6/ 10
Integrity
4.5
Transparency
5.5
Claim Safety
4.0
Documentation
4.5

Audit Analysis

This Gold Standard cookstove project in Myanmar has a combined additionality test and quantified leakage deduction, but is undermined by a direct contradiction on whether the VVB actually verified additionality (the 2020 validation report says no, the 2018 verification report says yes), a 15-percentage-point gap between assumed (100%) and verified (85%) usage rates, and 18 outstanding corrective actions. The ERR figures differ by a factor of 2.5 between the 2018 and 2023 documents, and no buffer pool or permanence mechanism is documented.

Red Flags

  • Additionality verification is directly contradicted: the 2018 verification report confirms VVB verification, but the more recent 2020 validation report records it as not verified by the VVB.
  • Usage rate assumed at 100% in the monitoring report but verified at only 85%, implying a ~17.6% over-claim on emission reductions.
  • Lifetime ex-ante ERR of 9,502 tCO2e (2023 validation report) is lower than the 14,582 tCO2e verified for the earlier 2016–2018 period (2018 verification report), suggesting the original claims were not supported by actual performance.
  • 18 corrective actions remain outstanding, including missing ODA declaration, incomplete stakeholder consultation records, and unresolved template non-compliance.

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2016
1,561631930
2017
1,6951,6950
2018
1411392
Total3,3972,465932

Risk Indicators

Additionality

Combined test present but VVB verification contradicted across documents

Permanence

efficiency project with lower but unaddressed reversal risk

Leakage

5% quantified in monitoring report but 0% in validation report; justification inconsistent

Baseline

Project-specific baseline, reassessed 2020; not jurisdictional

Safeguards

Grievance mechanism and benefit sharing present, but FPIC not conducted and 18 corrective actions outstanding

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status both not stated; dual-channel risk unaddressed

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-09-04General Methodology v2.1

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents