Skip to main content
GSEnergy Efficiency - DomesticMyanmarGeneral Methodologyv2.1

GS1729 Myanmar Stoves Campaign - Soneva in Myanmar - VPA No. 011

GS-1486 ↗ · current registry ID: GS6861

#1111of 1329 in Industrial#24of 25 in Myanmar#1562of 1801 in Gold Standard (GS)

4.1/ 10
Integrity
3.5
Transparency
5.0
Claim Safety
4.0
Documentation
4.5

Audit Analysis

This Gold Standard cookstove project in Myanmar presents a concerning integrity profile: the most recent verification report does not confirm additionality, the baseline is project-specific with no reassessment date, no buffer pool is in place, and the leakage treatment is contradictory across documents. The project delivered only about 42% of the pro-rata ex-ante expectation for the elapsed monitoring period, and the assumed 100% usage rate versus a verified ~80% creates a material over-crediting risk. Numerous material findings and corrective actions (over 40 combined) further erode confidence in the MRV calculations.

Red Flags

  • Additionality was NOT confirmed by the VVB in the most recent verification report (Nov 2023), contradicting the earlier validation report (Apr 2023) which stated it was verified
  • Usage rate assumed at 100% in the project design but verified at only 79.65% in the monitoring report — a 20-point gap that inflates claimed reductions
  • Leakage treatment is contradictory: the verification report applies a 0% deduction with a 'quantified' justification, while the monitoring report applies a 5% deduction with a 'deemed negligible' justification
  • The project delivered only ~42% of the pro-rata ex-ante expectation for the elapsed monitoring period (6,074 tCO2e verified vs ~14,472 tCO2e expected)

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2018
4,1094,1090
2019
9,7679,7670
2020
8,6825,5083,174
2021
6,89706,897
2022
3,54303,543
Total32,99819,38413,614

Risk Indicators

Additionality

Test present (combined) but not VVB-confirmed in latest VR

Permanence

no reversal events but risk unaddressed

Leakage

Contradictory: 0% vs 5% deduction; inconsistent justification

Baseline

Project-specific; no reassessment date found

Safeguards

Grievance mechanism and benefit sharing present; FPIC not conducted

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status not stated in available documents

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-09-04General Methodology v2.1

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents