Skip to main content
GSEnergy Efficiency - DomesticMyanmarGeneral Methodologyv2.1

GS1729 Myanmar Stoves Campaign - Soneva in Myanmar - VPA No. 015 by Soneva Foundation

GS-1924 ↗ · current registry ID: GS7512

#706of 1329 in Industrial#15of 25 in Myanmar#1058of 1801 in Gold Standard (GS)

4.8/ 10
Integrity
4.5
Transparency
5.0
Claim Safety
5.0
Documentation
4.5

Audit Analysis

A Gold Standard cookstove project in Myanmar with a named VVB (SustainCERT) and an investment additionality test, but undermined by a direct contradiction on whether the VVB actually verified additionality, a 0% leakage deduction that conflicts with a 5% figure in the monitoring report, and 18 open corrective actions. The project delivered roughly 50% of the pro-rata ex-ante expectation for the elapsed monitoring period, and FPIC was not conducted. Overall a moderate-quality project with meaningful data-reliability concerns.

Red Flags

  • Additionality verification is directly contradicted: the validation report (Apr 2023) states the VVB confirmed the investment test, while the verification report (Sep 2023) records it as not verified — the more recent verification report is privileged, leaving additionality unconfirmed.
  • Leakage deduction is 0% in the verification report but 5% in the 2022 monitoring report; the 'quantified' justification does not reconcile the two figures.
  • 18 corrective actions remain open, including unresolved disputes over the non-CO2 emission factor (EFb,non-CO2) raised as a FAR, sampling-design deficiencies, and missing ODA declaration.
  • FPIC was not conducted for a community-level cookstove distribution project in Myanmar.
  • Usage rate was assumed at 100% in the ex-ante estimate but verified at only 85.45%, a 15-percentage-point gap that directly inflates the ex-ante baseline.

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2019
6,0286,0280
2020
6,3576,254103
2021
5,48305,483
2022
3,48203,482
2023
2590259
Total21,60912,2829,327

Risk Indicators

Additionality

Investment test present but VVB verification contradicted

Permanence

Avoidance project – no carbon-storage reversal risk

Leakage

0% deduction conflicts with 5% in monitoring report

Baseline

Project-specific baseline; reassessment timing not stated

Safeguards

Grievance mechanism and benefit-sharing present; FPIC not conducted

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status not stated in available documents

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-09-04General Methodology v2.1

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents