Vai al contenuto principale
VCS Energy industries (renewable/non-renewable sources); Livestock, enteric fermentation, and manure management; Waste handling and disposal China Registry: Registered Documentazione completa General Methodology v2.0

Henan Zhumadian Youran Xiping Dairy Farm Biogas Utilization Project

VCS-5366 ↗

7.8 / 10
Integrity
7.4
Transparency
8.6
Claim Safety
6.8
Documentation
8.9

Score Breakdown

Integrity

verified CTI verified AMS-III.D methane recovery and found assumptions reasonable [Validation & Verification Report]

inferred Additionality is credible for manure biogas, but the excerpt does not show the full investment/barrier analysis

Transparency

verified Public registry-linked validation/verification deeds and joint report include ID 5366, dates, and methodology [Registry PDFs]

verified Report states monitoring period, crediting period, location, and verified volume

Claim Safety

verified Recent monitoring period (15-04-2023 to 31-12-2024) and verification completed 02-04-2025 [Verification Report]

inferred No evidence of CCP label, Article 6 authorization, or corresponding adjustment in the provided documents

Documentation

verified Validation deed, verification deed, and joint validation & verification report are public [Registry PDFs]

verified Report includes project description, findings, and verified issuance quantity of 91,275 tCO2e

Detailed Analysis

Integrity

CTI’s joint Validation & Verification Report states the project uses AMS-III.D (v21.0) for methane recovery in animal manure management systems and concludes the assumptions, baseline, leakage, and additionality treatment are reasonable and compliant. The project is a dairy-manure biogas system with 6 CSTR digesters, flaring of excess biogas, and internal use of electricity/heat, which is generally a credible mitigation pathway; however, the report excerpt does not provide the full additionality test details or quantified leakage deductions, so I score it below best-in-class. For this project type, the main integrity risk is whether the manure management and biogas capture would have occurred without carbon finance, but the independent verifier did validate the project and found no unresolved material issues.

Transparency

The official registry-linked documents are publicly available in the extracted materials: validation deed, verification deed, and a joint validation & verification report with project description, methodology, and conclusions. The report includes project ID 5366, location, crediting period, monitoring period, and issuance quantity, which supports strong public traceability. I do not see the full monitoring report text or registry issuance/retirement page in the excerpt, so transparency is high but not perfect.

Claim Safety

The project is on VCS, but there is no evidence here of CCP approval, Article 6 authorization, or corresponding adjustment, so buyer claim safety is moderate rather than excellent. The monitoring period is 15-04-2023 to 31-12-2024 and the verification was completed on 02-04-2025, so the vintage is recent and not a major timing concern. A buyer could credibly claim support for verified methane avoidance from dairy manure management, but should avoid implying host-country inventory cancellation or aviation-grade eligibility absent additional evidence.

Documentation

Documentation is strong: the materials include a validation deed, verification deed, and a joint validation & verification report, all tied to Verra project ID 5366. The report states the project was validated and verified by CTI, covers the 15-04-2023 to 31-12-2024 monitoring period, and reports 91,275 tCO2e verified for that period. The only meaningful gap is that the excerpt does not show the full monitoring report tables or the registry issuance/retirement record, so I do not assign a perfect score.

Overall

Overall, this is a solid registry-grade VCS biogas project with strong public audit evidence and a recent verification cycle. The biggest positive driver is documentation quality: the verifier’s joint report, deeds, and project details are all public and specific, which materially improves confidence. The main reason the score is not higher is that claim safety and integrity still depend on the underlying additionality case and claim framework, which are credible but not fully demonstrated in the excerpt. Confidence is high because the evidence is official and independently audited, but the project remains a standard VCM methane-avoidance credit rather than a premium-claim asset.

Audit Analysis

This is registry-grade evidence with a public validation/verification report, validation deed, and monitoring/verification materials from Verra. The project scores well on documentation and transparency, with moderate claim-safety and integrity because the main residual risk is additionality for a biogas project in a livestock/manure context rather than a data-access problem.

Project Description

Proponent: Zhumadian Youran Animal Husbandry Co., Ltd. Protocol categories: Energy industries (renewable/non-renewable sources); Livestock, enteric fermentation, and manure management; Waste handling and disposal Protocols: AMS-III.D. Estimated annual GHG reductions: 59610 tCO2e Region: Asia Registration date: 2025-10-27

No red flags detected.

Credit Vintages

Nessuna emissione registrata sul registro.

Cosa migliorerebbe questo punteggio

  • Publish the full monitoring report tables showing key parameters, operating hours, flare uptime, and any downtime or methane destruction efficiency calculations.
  • Disclose the project’s additionality analysis appendix, including investment/barrier tests and any common-practice assessment used by CTI.
  • If applicable, publish Article 6 authorization or corresponding-adjustment status to strengthen buyer claim safety.

Questi suggerimenti indicano quali prove pubbliche aggiuntive potrebbero migliorare il livello di confidenza di questa valutazione. Non garantiscono un punteggio futuro più alto.

Risk Indicators

Additionality

documented evidence

Permanence

low reversal risk for methane destruction

Leakage

methane recovery project with no obvious leakage issue in ex

Baseline

verifier accepted baseline and methodology

Safeguards

no material safeguard issues reported

Double-claim

no evidence of corresponding adjustment or authorization

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis Provenance Scored 2026-04-08 General Methodology v2.0 Documentazione completa

Sei il proprietario di questo progetto?

Correzione metadati (gratuita)

Nome, paese, marketplace o link errati? Segnalacelo.

Non modifica lo score.

[email protected]

Rivalutazione con nuovi documenti

Hai documentazione aggiornata non ancora inclusa? Puoi richiedere un nuovo run della pipeline con i nuovi input.

Invia Documenti