Highveld Air Quality - Sakhile project
GS-1297 ↗ · current registry ID: GS991
#1081of 1329 in Industrial#42of 59 in South Africa#1523of 1801 in Gold Standard (GS)
Audit Analysis
The Sakhile project is a domestic coal-fire energy efficiency initiative under Gold Standard with an investment-test additionality assessment and a project-specific baseline. However, the record is marred by five material findings, five required corrective actions, a contradictory leakage justification, and the absence of a named VVB, verified ERR figure, or buffer pool. The project delivered roughly 82% of its pro-rata ex-ante expectation for the first monitoring year, which is conservative, but the overall documentation and verification trail is thin.
Red Flags
- Leakage justification is contradictory: the 2011 monitoring report calls it 'deemed negligible' while the 2012 monitoring report calls it 'quantified', yet the deduction in both cases is 0%.
- Five material findings were logged in the verification report, including a wrong registration date, a missing 'Emission reductions claimed' section, an unidentifiable source reference, and raw survey data that was not initially uploaded.
- No VVB name, no verified ERR figure, no FNRB value, and no usage-rate data appear in the extracted record, leaving the verification chain incomplete.
- The verification report claims 5,455 tCO2e for the period while the later monitoring report claims 3,294.98 tCO2e — a 39% discrepancy that was never reconciled in the available documents.
Credit Vintages Exhausted
| Issued | Retired | Available | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | 2,008 | 2,008 | 0 | |
| 2011 | 2,527 | 2,527 | 0 | |
| 2012 | 920 | 920 | 0 | |
| Total | 5,455 | 5,455 | 0 |
Risk Indicators
Investment test present but VVB confirmation not stated
mixed evidence / unresolved risk
0% deduction with contradictory justification
Project-specific baseline, no reassessment recorded
Safeguards and benefit-sharing mentioned but FPIC and grievance mechanism not detailed
CORSIA and CCP status not stated in available documents
⚑ Dispute this rating
Are you the project owner?
Metadata correction (free)
Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.
Does not modify the score.
[email protected] →Pipeline re-run with new documents
Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.
Submit Documents →