Skip to main content
GSEnergy Efficiency - DomesticSouth AfricaGeneral Methodologyv2.1

Highveld Air Quality - Sakhile project

GS-1297 ↗ · current registry ID: GS991

#1081of 1329 in Industrial#42of 59 in South Africa#1523of 1801 in Gold Standard (GS)

4.2/ 10
Integrity
4.5
Transparency
3.5
Claim Safety
4.5
Documentation
4.0

Audit Analysis

The Sakhile project is a domestic coal-fire energy efficiency initiative under Gold Standard with an investment-test additionality assessment and a project-specific baseline. However, the record is marred by five material findings, five required corrective actions, a contradictory leakage justification, and the absence of a named VVB, verified ERR figure, or buffer pool. The project delivered roughly 82% of its pro-rata ex-ante expectation for the first monitoring year, which is conservative, but the overall documentation and verification trail is thin.

Red Flags

  • Leakage justification is contradictory: the 2011 monitoring report calls it 'deemed negligible' while the 2012 monitoring report calls it 'quantified', yet the deduction in both cases is 0%.
  • Five material findings were logged in the verification report, including a wrong registration date, a missing 'Emission reductions claimed' section, an unidentifiable source reference, and raw survey data that was not initially uploaded.
  • No VVB name, no verified ERR figure, no FNRB value, and no usage-rate data appear in the extracted record, leaving the verification chain incomplete.
  • The verification report claims 5,455 tCO2e for the period while the later monitoring report claims 3,294.98 tCO2e — a 39% discrepancy that was never reconciled in the available documents.

Credit Vintages Exhausted

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2010
2,0082,0080
2011
2,5272,5270
2012
9209200
Total5,4555,4550

Risk Indicators

Additionality

Investment test present but VVB confirmation not stated

Permanence

mixed evidence / unresolved risk

Leakage

0% deduction with contradictory justification

Baseline

Project-specific baseline, no reassessment recorded

Safeguards

Safeguards and benefit-sharing mentioned but FPIC and grievance mechanism not detailed

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status not stated in available documents

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-09-05General Methodology v2.1

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents