Home on the Range

Integrity

The verification report (2023) confirms additionality and reports no avoidable or unavoidable reversals during the 2022 reporting period, which supports integrity for an avoided conversion project. The baseline is described as project-based (U.S. Grassland Protocol v2.1), but the extracted record does not show when the baseline was last reassessed, which weakens confidence over a long crediting period (2016–2066). Leakage is said to be quantified, yet the actual leakage deduction percentage was not found in the extracted record, creating uncertainty about net credited reductions. No buffer/pooling percentage was found in the extracted record, limiting visibility into how longer-term reversal risk is managed.

Transparency

The verification report (2023) provides a clear monitoring period (2022-01-01 to 2022-12-31) and identifies the VVB as Ruby Canyon Environmental, Inc., which supports transparency. However, the extracted record does not include the project’s claimed ERR total for the period, making it harder to reconcile how the verified 8,566 tCO2e compares to what was originally reported. Key quantitative parameters that would allow independent checking—especially the leakage deduction percentage—were not found in the extracted record. Registry-level fields like CORSIA eligibility are also not present in the extracted record.

Claim Safety

Because additionality is confirmed by the VVB in the verification report (2023), the risk of non-additional crediting is reduced. Still, over-crediting risk cannot be fully evaluated because the extracted record does not provide the leakage deduction percentage even though leakage is described as quantified. The baseline is project-specific, and the extracted record does not show a baseline reassessment date, which can increase uncertainty over time. CCP status and CORSIA eligibility were not found in the extracted record, so downstream claim compatibility and double-claim signaling cannot be confidently assessed.

Documentation

The extracted record includes a recent verification report (dated 2023-08-17) covering the 2022 monitoring period, with no material findings and no corrective actions required, which supports documentation quality. Minimum extraction confidence is high, suggesting the key document was readable. However, only “verification_report” is listed in the evidence documents, and several important quantitative fields (leakage deduction percentage, buffer/pooling percentage, baseline reassessment timing) were not found in the extracted record. This indicates incomplete document coverage in the available extraction set even if the single report is strong.

Overall

Overall quality is moderately strong on governance signals (independent VVB verification, no findings, no reversals reported) based on the verification report (2023). The main limitations are missing quantitative details needed to audit net credited reductions (especially the leakage deduction value) and missing information on any buffer/pooling approach over a long crediting period. There are no contradictions listed in the extracted record, so no cross-document discrepancies needed to be resolved. Note: if documentation were scored below 3.0, transparency would be capped post-scoring, and if integrity were below 4.0, the overall would be capped at 6.0 (gate rules applied outside this output).